2018
DOI: 10.1177/1750698017736841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building bridges? Remembering the 1641 rebellion in Northern Ireland

Abstract: This essay explores the changing place of the 1641 rebellion in the memory cultures of Ulster loyalist communities before and after the Good Friday Agreement of 1998. Focusing on the loyalist centres of Portadown and West Belfast, I show that commemorative activities particularly flourished during periods of crisis in these communities as they moved (or were moved) towards compromise. The 1641 Depositions Project has argued that the 'memory' of 1641 must be replaced by 'history'. The potential for the transfor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Johnston, 2013), with the exception of the contributions to the edited volume by Rekdal and Poppe (2014) and the work of Schlüter (2010a, 2010b, 2014a, 2014b), most theoretically oriented engagement with Irish memory cultures refers to the modern period, English language sources, and to political contexts (e.g. Conway, 2010; Hackett and Rolston, 2009; Leerssen, 1986; McAreavey, 2018; Pine, 2010; Rolston, 2010 exceptions being the bilingual sources of Ó Tuama, 1985, and Frawley, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Johnston, 2013), with the exception of the contributions to the edited volume by Rekdal and Poppe (2014) and the work of Schlüter (2010a, 2010b, 2014a, 2014b), most theoretically oriented engagement with Irish memory cultures refers to the modern period, English language sources, and to political contexts (e.g. Conway, 2010; Hackett and Rolston, 2009; Leerssen, 1986; McAreavey, 2018; Pine, 2010; Rolston, 2010 exceptions being the bilingual sources of Ó Tuama, 1985, and Frawley, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%