2012
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building better systems of care for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people: findings from the Kanyini health systems assessment

Abstract: BackgroundAustralian federal and jurisdictional governments are implementing ambitious policy initiatives intended to improve health care access and outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. In this qualitative study we explored Aboriginal Medical Service (AMS) staff views on factors needed to improve chronic care systems and assessed their relevance to the new policy environment.MethodsTwo theories informed the study: (1) ‘candidacy’, which explores “the ways in which people’s eligibility for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the data analyzed for this report did not allow us to quantify access to or acceptance of medical care, others have found many barriers to Aboriginal people receiving optimal medical and surgical care for chronic diseases, related to healthcare systems, remoteness, and cultural factors. 22,23 In the case of RHD, there is the added complication that cardiac surgery is not available in the NT, so surgical intervention involves travel to cities many thousands of kilometers away. If outcomes for RHD are to be improved in similar settings, healthcare services must improve the capacity of the health workforce, the availability of specialist care, the systems for delivering care to patients with complex, chronic diseases, and the mechanisms to address cultural impediments to uptake of Western medical care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the data analyzed for this report did not allow us to quantify access to or acceptance of medical care, others have found many barriers to Aboriginal people receiving optimal medical and surgical care for chronic diseases, related to healthcare systems, remoteness, and cultural factors. 22,23 In the case of RHD, there is the added complication that cardiac surgery is not available in the NT, so surgical intervention involves travel to cities many thousands of kilometers away. If outcomes for RHD are to be improved in similar settings, healthcare services must improve the capacity of the health workforce, the availability of specialist care, the systems for delivering care to patients with complex, chronic diseases, and the mechanisms to address cultural impediments to uptake of Western medical care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the CEA of the intervention will provide data critical to clinical and public policy decisions with respect to incorporation of the intervention into routine care at the primary and tertiary healthcare levels. Such decisions will be enhanced by our incorporation of direct and indirect costs to the family, the community and the healthcare sector, 60 particularly given the focus on resource allocation in Indigenous health in Australia, 61 and the different mechanisms for delivery of primary healthcare services compared with mainstream Australia. 62 We have incorporated microbiological components into the RCT as the role of infectious agents in the transition from ARI to chronic wet cough remains largely unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of these issues relate to the themes of candidacy, in particular navigation and making services more permeable (5,6). The relationship between Aboriginal people and the staff at brokerage service is ongoing and dynamic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the published literature on access to health care and increasingly, in Aboriginal health research the concept of candidacy is discussed (5). The term candidacy arose from a systematic review and interpretive synthesis of access to health care by vulnerable people (6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%