1994
DOI: 10.2307/749486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building and Understanding Multiplicative Relationships: A Study of Prospective Elementary Teachers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
60
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
60
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This study contributes to the discussion (e.g. Simon & Blume, 1994;Southwell & Penglase, 2005;Misailidou & Williams, 2002;Tatto, Schwillie, Senk, & Ingvarson, 2012) of strengths and weaknesses of pre-service teachers MCK of proportional reasoning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study contributes to the discussion (e.g. Simon & Blume, 1994;Southwell & Penglase, 2005;Misailidou & Williams, 2002;Tatto, Schwillie, Senk, & Ingvarson, 2012) of strengths and weaknesses of pre-service teachers MCK of proportional reasoning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies have demonstrated that a fully developed understanding of linear and area measurement requires the coordination of multiple ideas and that the process of coordination can vary from student to student. Moreover, Simon and Blume (1994) demonstrated that difficulties coordinating ideas related to linear and area measurement can persist well beyond elementary grades. They found that, in a group of 26 preservice teachers, many did not fully understand the multiplicative relation between linear and area measurements of rectangles.…”
Section: Students' Understandings Of Rectangular Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classifications of situations that can be modeled by multiplication have consistently included rectangular areas (e.g., Greer, 1992;Schmidt & Weiser, 1995;Schwartz, 1988;Vergnaud, 1983Vergnaud, , 1988, and research on multiplication has used rectangles to illustrate multiplication of fractions and the commutative property (Greer, 1992). Some researchers have suggested, however, that students connect multiplication to areas of rectangles by reciting, but not understanding, the length times width formula (De Corte, Verschaffel, & Van Coillie, 1988;Nesher, 1992;Peled & Nesher, 1988;Simon & Blume, 1994). Several multiplication studies have taken place in classrooms (e.g., Confrey & Scarano, 1995;Hino, 2002;Izsák, 2004b;Lampert, 1986aLampert, , 1986bMechmandarov, 1987, as discussed by Nesher, 1988;Scarano & Confrey, 1996;Treffers, 1987), but only those by Hino and by Izsák have had a primary focus on arrays and rectangular areas.…”
Section: Research On Whole-number Multiplication Arrays and Rectangmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eventhough the PSTs were confortable calculating the area and the perimeter of the presented rectangles in this study, there is evidence in the literature that teachersstruggle with the concepts of perimeter and area (Baturo & Nason, 1996;Fuller, 1997;Heaton, 1992;Ma, 1999). They show limited understanding and various misconceptions such as believing that there is a constant relationship between area and perimeter (Baturo & Nason, 1996;Simon & Blume, 1994;Ma, 1999). Below is an excerpt to demonstrate PSTs' responses to the sample question 3 in table 3.…”
Section: Figure 2 Geometric Shapes Used During Interviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%