2010
DOI: 10.1080/13670050903474127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building anAssessment Use Argumentfor sign language: the BSL Nonsense Sign Repetition Test

Abstract: This is the unspecified version of the paper.This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A subset of participants was administered the NWR twice (with an interval of 12-16 months). The task is an adaptation of (and therefore followed the guidelines and tested the constructs articulated in) Mann & Marshall (2010), originally created for British Sign Language but since adapted for other languages as well. As in the BSL task, participants were required to repeat items contrasting along one of the articulatory dimensions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A subset of participants was administered the NWR twice (with an interval of 12-16 months). The task is an adaptation of (and therefore followed the guidelines and tested the constructs articulated in) Mann & Marshall (2010), originally created for British Sign Language but since adapted for other languages as well. As in the BSL task, participants were required to repeat items contrasting along one of the articulatory dimensions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…& Baddeley 1990, i.a. ), in DHH children, success on such a task predicts success on other language measures (Mann Marshall 2010, Enns & Herman 2011, Allen & Enns 2013. In this paper, we follow suit.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These critiques suggest that AUA model, which provides a framework for analyzing the validity and practicality of tests, has not been fully applied to DET. The AUA offers an explicit logical structure for evaluating the links in the argument and makes explicit the relationship between the validity and utilization arguments (Llosa, 2008;Mann and Marshall, 2010;DeBarger et al, 2016). Despite limitations in accessing the content of the actual test due to copyright issues, this paper aims to evaluate the consequential validity and specific test performance in the official mock test with AUA model.…”
Section: Consequential Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%