2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10816-017-9337-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building an Experimental Comparative Reference Collection for Lithic Micro-Residue Analysis Based on a Multi-Analytical Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, recent work has also called this link into question (Rots et al 2016), as the location of residues does not necessarily indicate that they are use-related (Xhauflair et al 2017) or contamination distributed along edges (Pedergnana and Ollé 2017). New experimental research (J. Mercader, M. Soto, personal observation, 2018) is focusing on detecting patterns of microbotanical attachment in natural rocks (lying on modern surfaces and in contact with surrounding soils) to build a baseline whereby residue density estimation by geographic information system (GIS) and nearest neighbour heat maps of plant materials adhering to rock surfaces can be compared with residue scatters from stone tools.…”
Section: Authentication Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, recent work has also called this link into question (Rots et al 2016), as the location of residues does not necessarily indicate that they are use-related (Xhauflair et al 2017) or contamination distributed along edges (Pedergnana and Ollé 2017). New experimental research (J. Mercader, M. Soto, personal observation, 2018) is focusing on detecting patterns of microbotanical attachment in natural rocks (lying on modern surfaces and in contact with surrounding soils) to build a baseline whereby residue density estimation by geographic information system (GIS) and nearest neighbour heat maps of plant materials adhering to rock surfaces can be compared with residue scatters from stone tools.…”
Section: Authentication Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The function of the SSBs was revealed by an integrated use-wear and residue analysis. Methods and criteria for identifying, describing, and interpreting macro-and micro-wear and residues on stone tools were based on well-known literature in the field of functional studies of material culture [8,[54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66]. Use-wear and residues preserved on the SSBs were analyzed at DANTE-Diet and Ancient Technology Laboratory (at Sapienza University of Rome) (1) using a digital stereomicroscope (Zeiss AXIO Zoom, with magnification ranging from 10× to 173×) and (2) using a metallographic microscope (Zeiss Axio Scope A1, with magnification ranging from 50× to 500×).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interpretation of archaeological residues was based on the comparison with an experimental macro-residues collection (see below) as well as using the available literature on experimental residues on stone tools [64][65][70][71][72][73][74].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of both techniques helps distinguishing residues due to tool use from contamination . Other non‐destructive techniques are also very useful for identifying microresidues on stone tools such as Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy, also coupled with energy dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of both techniques helps distinguishing residues due to tool use from contamination. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Other non-destructive techniques are also very useful for identifying microresidues on stone tools such as Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy [10] and scanning electron microscopy, [11] also coupled with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. [12] Sibudu is a large rock shelter ( Figure S1a), situated on the banks of the uThongathi River in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, with Middle Stone Age (MSA) occupations from 77,000 to 38,000 years ago.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%