2017
DOI: 10.24251/hicss.2017.112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building an Environmental Sustainability Dictionary for the IT Industry

Abstract: Content analysis is a commonly utilized methodology in corporate sustainability research. However, because most corporate sustainability research using content analysis is based on human coding, the research capability and the scope of the research design has limitations. The relatively recent text mining technique addresses some of the limitations of manual content analysis but its usage is often dependent upon the development of a domain specific dictionary. This paper develops an environmental sustainabilit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, it is a database populated by terms and phrases belonging to the language of sustainability, organized according to a taxonomic structure that groups them by sustainability themes. The systematization of the terminology of the sustainability language envisaged the establishment of a controlled vocabulary, following the procedure outlined by Deng et al (2017). The corpus of terms of the vocabulary has been elaborated starting from three dictionaries or encyclopaedias already published on the subject (Beck, 2014; Idowu et al , 2015; Robertson, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, it is a database populated by terms and phrases belonging to the language of sustainability, organized according to a taxonomic structure that groups them by sustainability themes. The systematization of the terminology of the sustainability language envisaged the establishment of a controlled vocabulary, following the procedure outlined by Deng et al (2017). The corpus of terms of the vocabulary has been elaborated starting from three dictionaries or encyclopaedias already published on the subject (Beck, 2014; Idowu et al , 2015; Robertson, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Categorization modeling (known more generically as dictionary development), is an explicitly deductive technique [23] [24]. Essentially, what dictionary development requires is to develop a semantic structure that represents the concept one wants to explore within the dataset.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, deductive techniques are confirmatory, and allow us to ask specific research questions of the data and to even test hypotheses. We can build, adopt, or adapt dictionaries or categorization models to help us explore specific topics in the dataset, to determine the degree of their presence or absence [23] [24]. Specific variants of these models allow us to conduct sentiment analysis, to characterize positive and negative sentiment or polarity within the dataset [25].…”
Section: Conceptual Framework For Text Miningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although important in a more exhaustive review, lower frequency words do not help as much to identify a small number of broad themes in a large data set. This five-case cutoff was arbitrarily chosen, but necessary to impose practical constraints on the process [21]. The analysis then focused on 4,153 unique words and 20,478 unique phrases.…”
Section: Count Words and Phrasesmentioning
confidence: 99%