Building an enterprise architecture step by step

Armour, Frank; Kaisler, Stephen H.; Liu, S.Y.

doi:10.1109/6294.781623

Cited by 67 publications

(61 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Many frameworks do not include a methodology, although the TOGAF, DODAF, and the TISAF [1,2] did so. The DODAF [6] is mandated by the U.S. Department of Defense for most of its enterprise architecture efforts.…”

Section: Ea Methodology a Methodology Specifiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Compliance: Compliance with standards and regulations was only briefly cited in early frameworks, [1] for example. The emergence of compliance as a major management challenge, also makes it a major methodology challenge as each stage (see [2] for example) must incorporate methodological practices to ensure that compliance with standards and regulations are satisfied. A separate issue is a methodology for the assessment and enforcement of an IT project's compliance with the EA.…”

Section: Table 5 Ea Methodology Challengesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

15 Years of Enterprise Architecting at HICSS: Revisiting the Critical Problems

Kaisler¹,

Armour²

2017

Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2017)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Enterprise Architecture (EA) minitrack has been a mainstay of HICSS for the past 15 years. The methodology, tools, and processes of enterprise architecting have evolved during that period. In 2005, Kaisler and Armour identified some critical challenges in modeling, management, and maintenance for EA that needed attention to ensure a viable technical discipline. Over 15 years, we have accepted 93 papers for presentation. Reviewing these papers and drawing up on our experience over the past 15 years, we conclude that some progress has been made, some challenges remain to be addressed, and some new challenges have emerged. This paper revises existing challenges and identifies additional challenges to be addressed in the next 10 years.

show abstract

Section: Ea Methodology a Methodology Specifiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Table 5 Ea Methodology Challengesmentioning

confidence: 99%

15 Years of Enterprise Architecting at HICSS: Revisiting the Critical Problems

Kaisler¹,

Armour²

2017

Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2017)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Architecture description languages like ArchiMate help to create architecture models along the viewpoints [33], [34]. On the process dimension several EA frameworks are supported with life cycle models which enable EA planning and management [6], [8], [11]. Life cycle models support the 'how' and organize the architecture governance processes.…”

Section: Enterprise Architecture Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Contextual Components of an Enterprise Architecture Framework for Pan-European eGovernment Services

Mondorf

Wimmer

2017

Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2017)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The analysis methods in the EA community including [2] [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24]. The main contributions of our approach which make it different from the approaches of group 2 are as below: a) In our approach, the criteria and sub-criteria of a quality attribute are given different weights according to the EA layers each of them belong to and also the importance of each EA layer in the enterprise.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Taking a holistic approach, Enterprise Architecture focuses not only on the technical aspects but also on the various aspects of the enterprise upon which the IT systems operate [2]. Enterprise architecture analysis is the application of property assessment criteria on EA models.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Approach towards Enterprise Architecture Analysis using AHP and Fuzzy AHP

Davoudi¹,

Sheikhvand²

2012

IJMLC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-Enterprise Architecture (EA) as a discipline that manages large amount of models and information about different aspects of the enterprise can support decision making on enterprise-wide issues. In order to provide such support, EA information should be amenable to analysis of various utilities and quality attributes. In this regard, this paper provides an approach based on Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) towards EA analysis. It proposes an extended quantitative method of assessing quality attribute achievement of different scenarios using AHP and Fuzzy AHP based on the knowledge and experience of EA experts and domain experts. Due to the uncertainty in the judgments of participants, the crisp pair-wise comparison in the conventional AHP is insufficient and imprecise to capture the right judgments. Therefore, a fuzzy logic is introduced in the pair-wise comparison of AHP in one of steps of the method. The applicability of the proposed approach is demonstrated using a practical case study.Index Terms-Enterprise architecture analysis, quality attribute, analytical hierarchy process, fuzzy logic, fuzzy AHP.

show abstract

Building an enterprise architecture step by step

Cited by 67 publications

References 1 publication

15 Years of Enterprise Architecting at HICSS: Revisiting the Critical Problems

15 Years of Enterprise Architecting at HICSS: Revisiting the Critical Problems

Contextual Components of an Enterprise Architecture Framework for Pan-European eGovernment Services

An Approach towards Enterprise Architecture Analysis using AHP and Fuzzy AHP

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About