2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-17656-3_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building an Efficient Lattice Gadget Toolkit: Subgaussian Sampling and More

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To be fully homomorphic, it relies on external products between TRGSW and TRLWE samples. In this case, we first decompose the TRLWE sample in TRLWE samples using a Gadget decomposition algorithm [GMP19]. Then, we perform an inner product between the decomposed TRLWE and the TRGSW sample (which already is a vector of TRLWE samples).…”
Section: Arithmeticmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To be fully homomorphic, it relies on external products between TRGSW and TRLWE samples. In this case, we first decompose the TRLWE sample in TRLWE samples using a Gadget decomposition algorithm [GMP19]. Then, we perform an inner product between the decomposed TRLWE and the TRGSW sample (which already is a vector of TRLWE samples).…”
Section: Arithmeticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain formal guarantees of independence (instead of a heuristic), Chillotti et al [CGGI20] points out that we could perform the gadget decomposition in a probabilistic way. We implemented the probabilistic gadget decomposition proposed by Genise et al [GMP19], but we obtained no improvements over the deterministic algorithm. We were only able to obtain the linear growth by lowering the error variance introduced by the gadget decomposition.…”
Section: Suitable Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We improve an existing efficient subgaussian gadget decomposition algorithm [3] with a noncentral bounded uniform distribution which is a subgaussian distribution [18]. Our algorithm theoretically achieves Pythagorean error growth, linear time complexity as [3], and much faster computation cost. Hence, it can be an alternative of naive digit decomposition used in FHE schemes without any extra assumption in practice.…”
Section: A Our Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coefficient of output is larger than binary decomposition with an additional factor Ω( √ log k). Therefore, subgaussian sampling is regarded as a potential alternative [2], [3] since it can achieve not only significant properties of the Gaussian distribution such as Pythagorean additivity without the factor Ω( √ log k) but also somewhat faster implementation performance due to its relaxed probability condition. Even though subgaussian sampling has much more attractive advantages in many advanced cryptosystems, the importance of the subgaussian distribution has mainly been studied in a theoretical way [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation