Building an archaeological data repository: a digital library and digital humanities collaboration at the University of South Florida

Mi, Xiying; Bernardy, Richard; Schmidt, LeEtta

doi:10.1007/s00799-020-00297-1

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Faculty are experimenting and extending research repositories to faculty or departmental levels to achieve numerous benefits such as enriching and exhibiting their collections, as evidenced by the sample of articles included in this review. Similarly, the ability of a research repository to provide open material provides researchers with a database to record and store data at various stages of a project, then maintain it for the long term and give interconnections between DLP 38,2 projects documented (Mi et al, 2021). What began as a proposal from the American Association of Colleges of Nursing in 2015 to archive doctoral nursing projects (DNP) in a digital repository soon found additional benefits beyond compliance, according to an article by Heselden et al (2019).…”

Section: Faculty Research Repositoriesmentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic review of faculty research repositories at higher education institutions

Zibani

Rajkoomar

Naicker

2021

DLP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This study aims to evaluate faculty research repositories used in higher education institutions, their different levels and functions with regard to research information management. This is revealed through the selected studies reviewed. Design/methodology/approach A systematic literature search of journal article studies on research repositories in higher education institutions was carried out on several databases, namely, Ebscohost, Emerald Insight, Science Direct, Sage, Google Scholar, SA e-Publications and citation databases such as Scopus and Web of Science. The systematic review was conducted in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. The time frame for the analysis was 2015 to 2021. Findings The findings are presented on the motives for developing faculty research repositories the services provided and benefits derived from faculty research repositories and what is the utilization of faculty research repositories. Originality/value The results show that the development of research repositories at the faculty level enhances sharing, analysis, evaluation and preservation of scholarly research produced.

show abstract

Section: Faculty Research Repositoriesmentioning

confidence: 99%