2014
DOI: 10.1080/10357823.2014.958054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building a Venture Capital Market in Vietnam: Diffusion of a Neoliberal Market Strategy to a Socialist State

Abstract: Vietnam's venture capital (VC) industry took shape in the late 1990s during a period of exceptional economic growth in the country and the development of its high-technology sector. High growth rates and technological advances have typically coincided with both strong VC market activity and state support of equity financing. This, however, has not been the case in Vietnam. In this article a policy diffusion framework is used to investigate the international and domestic origins of Vietnam's nascent VC policies… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intel decided to invest in Vietnam as it scaled down testing and assembly in its China facility, for reasons of rising costs and fear of intellectual property theft. It chose Vietnam thanks to the efforts of a returnee who had worked at Intel's Santa Clara headquarters for fifteen years, and then lobbied top management to agree to the investment, under his management (Klingler-Vidra, 2014b). Intel came at its own initiative, without much courting by government.…”
Section: Vietnam's Sandt Policy Context: Multinationals Firm Capabilities and Returneesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intel decided to invest in Vietnam as it scaled down testing and assembly in its China facility, for reasons of rising costs and fear of intellectual property theft. It chose Vietnam thanks to the efforts of a returnee who had worked at Intel's Santa Clara headquarters for fifteen years, and then lobbied top management to agree to the investment, under his management (Klingler-Vidra, 2014b). Intel came at its own initiative, without much courting by government.…”
Section: Vietnam's Sandt Policy Context: Multinationals Firm Capabilities and Returneesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, the international community has been very active in its support for Vietnam's capacity building and development needs. Official development assistance is the country's significant source of finance, accounting for one third of the state's public budget (Klingler‐Vidra, ). The international community especially focuses its assistance on Vietnam's transition to a market economy with 63% of the total aid allocated to the economic sector and 14% to governance reform during 2000–09 (OECD, ).…”
Section: Vietnam's Hospital Autonomy Policies and Incentivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development assistance in Vietnam pushed the country to take policy prescriptions from international donors as a condition for funding (Klingler‐Vidra, ). In governance reform, the development assistance from such donors as World Bank, International Monetary Fund, and United Nations Development Programme has particularly aimed at accelerating the process of decentralisation from central to local government and autonomisation within public sector organisations including state‐owned enterprises (SOEs) and public service delivery units (PSDUs).…”
Section: Vietnam's Hospital Autonomy Policies and Incentivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the predominant credit-based financing agenda by the Vietnamese government, venture-capital activities had a slow start in the 1990s, and Vietnam's entrepreneurial financing initiatives have significantly diverged from international venturecapital policy patterns (Klingler-Vidra 2014 In 2015, the government also explored the opportunity of setting up a VCF to support newborn ecosystem for tech-related entrepreneurs, with assistance from statefinanced sci-tech supports agencies such as NAFOSTED/NATIF/NATEC, Vietnam Startup Fund, and Vietnam Silicon Valley Project. Still, there is a lack of local funds so that earlystage tech startups are underfinanced.…”
Section: Figure 24 Average Lending Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%