Building a taxonomy of integrated palliative care initiatives: results from a focus group

Abstract

BackgroundEmpirical evidence suggests that integrated palliative care (IPC) increases the quality of care for palliative patients and supports professional caregivers. Existing IPC initiatives in Europe vary in their design and are hardly comparable. InSuP-C, a European Union research project, aimed to build a taxonomy of IPC initiatives applicable across diseases, healthcare sectors and systems.MethodsThe taxonomy of IPC initiatives was developed in cooperation with an international and multidisciplinary focus group of 18 experts. Subsequently, a consensus meeting of 10 experts revised a preliminary taxonomy and adopted the final classification system.ResultsConsisting of eight categories, with two to four items each, the taxonomy covers the process and structure of IPC initiatives. If two items in at least one category apply to an initiative, a minimum level of integration is assumed to have been reached. Categories range from the type of initiative (items: pathway, model or guideline) to patients’ key contact (items: non-pc specialist, pc specialist, general practitioner). Experts recommended the inclusion of two new categories: level of care (items: primary, secondary or tertiary) indicating at which stage palliative care is integrated and primary focus of intervention describing IPC givers’ different roles (items: treating function, advising/consulting or training) in the care process.ConclusionsEmpirical studies are required to investigate how the taxonomy is used in practice and whether it covers the reality of patients in need of palliative care. The InSuP-C project will test this taxonomy empirically in selected initiatives using IPC.

How continuity of care is experienced within the context of integrated palliative care: A qualitative study with patients and family caregivers in five European countries

“…It aims to achieve quality of life and a wellsupported dying process for the patient and the family in collaboration with all the caregivers, paid and unpaid. 36 We developed these criteria in order to have initiatives that would reflect the cross-sector and multidisciplinary nature of integrated care. From the integrated palliative care initiatives, we recruited patients and their family caregivers using inclusion criteria ( Table 2).…”

The Manage Care Model – Developing an Evidence-Based and Expert-Driven Chronic Care Management Model for Patients with Diabetes

“…Three consensus meetings in February, April and May 2016 were set up to iteratively develop the model using feedback of the MANAGE CARE Study Group. This is in line with previous consensus meetings [21][22][23]. The extensive list of unmet needs was reviewed by the MANAGE CARE Study Group to identify requirements and potential dimensions for the new model.…”

Moving the integration of palliative care from idea to practice

“…It aims to achieve quality of life and a well-supported dying process for the patient and the family in collaboration with all the caregivers, paid and unpaid. 2 However, the integration of palliative care remains an area that needs further investigation, on a conceptual level as well as on a practical level. This Special Edition of Palliative Medicine therefore contains contributions about the integration of palliative care from several disciplinary backgrounds, using several research methods in services for adults and children and for those experiencing a number of life-limiting conditions.…”