SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2011 2011
DOI: 10.1190/1.3627616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building a seismic‐driven 3D geomechanical model in a deep carbonate reservoir

Abstract: In this paper we show how to extend seismic-driven earth model building into the domain of geomechanics and drilling. A mechanical earth model (MEM) is a quantitative description of rock mechanical properties and in-situ stresses in the subsurface. Formation strength and in-situ stress are key components that impact well design. Most mechanical earth models, even today, are one-dimensional (1D), based on well and drilling data alone. The concept of using seismically derived horizons and velocities to extend th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we were able to proceed to 3D geomechanical model construction. The workflow of this process is summarized in Figure 7 ( [6,[27][28][29][30]).…”
Section: Density Volume Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, we were able to proceed to 3D geomechanical model construction. The workflow of this process is summarized in Figure 7 ( [6,[27][28][29][30]).…”
Section: Density Volume Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These properties are called "dynamic" because of their high-frequency contents. Nevertheless, their calibration can be guaranteed using laboratory tests on cores: the UCS cube was calculated from a UCS vs. Young's modulus correlation based on the regional core tests in the four wells, and the TSTR was estimated at 6-8% of the UCS [28]. The obtained 3D rock properties are illustrated in Figure 9.…”
Section: Rock Typingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a simple assumption is missing the anisotropic behavior of the properties. Seismic-data-driven models can resolve the spatial anisotropic issue; however, to date, they have only focused on the reservoir and caprock intervals [3,31]. Considering these issues, Rahman et al [32] proposed the seismic-inverted-property-driven 3D field-scale geomechanical model workflow, where an integrated approach has been introduced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study including seismic inversion model construction was conducted. It consists of inverting the seismic data before summation in order to highlight the differences in lithology and thus to better understand, characterize, and evaluate the reservoir [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%