2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ara.2021.100286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building a scientific model for East Asian pastoral origins: A reply to Honeychurch et al.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite these tantalizing links between climate changes and pastoral dynamics, the paleoclimatic and -environmental records for Mongolia suffer from poor temporal resolution, age uncertainties, and/or ambiguous proxy interpretation. Oftentimes, chronological frameworks designed for geological research questions (with wide error ranges) are applied to archaeological timescales, meaning that the same dataset can be used to draw widely differing conclusions 37 . Anthropogenic impacts related to herding have also drastically impacted Mongolia’s landscape — meaning that pollen and any other biological data, for example, might be affected by human land-use since 1200 or even 3000 BCE 8 , 31 , which could hamper a direct paleohydrological reconstruction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these tantalizing links between climate changes and pastoral dynamics, the paleoclimatic and -environmental records for Mongolia suffer from poor temporal resolution, age uncertainties, and/or ambiguous proxy interpretation. Oftentimes, chronological frameworks designed for geological research questions (with wide error ranges) are applied to archaeological timescales, meaning that the same dataset can be used to draw widely differing conclusions 37 . Anthropogenic impacts related to herding have also drastically impacted Mongolia’s landscape — meaning that pollen and any other biological data, for example, might be affected by human land-use since 1200 or even 3000 BCE 8 , 31 , which could hamper a direct paleohydrological reconstruction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1900 BC (Jeong et al, 2020: 893-894;Shaughnessy, 1988). This later date, spreading from Sintashta and into Central and East Asia with Andronovo has recently been substantiated with genetic evidence (Librado et al, 2021), which also helps explain why horse terminology was not adopted into the eastern steppe zone, and linguistically into Uralic or Turkic, with the Afanasievo spread (Taylor, 2021;Honeychurch et al, 2021). The spread of Sintashta-derived domesticated horses perhaps supplanted earlier and less sophisticated horse usage, since also earlier branches of Indo-European attest to a common word and must all have been well acquainted with the horse continually since they broke away from Proto-Indo-European.…”
Section: Horse (And Chariot)mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…in the Altai-Sayan Mountain region and Minusinsk Basin; they are deemed the earliest herders and copper-working people in the region, which leads to their attribution to the Eneolithic or Early Bronze Age period. Their diet, however, seems to have been more aligned with Neolithic food patterns than with later Bronze Age diets that are characterized by elevated dairy and meat consumption (Honeychurch et al 2021; reply by Taylor 2021). Graves marked by stone constructions above the surface represented the norm in premodern Mongolia ever since, which makes them easily detectable during pedestrian surveys (Eregzen 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%