2015
DOI: 10.18665/sr.221053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building a Pathway to Student Success at Georgia State University

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Other institutions, such as Georgia State University, have been reaching out to students during the summer, allowing students to choose “meta‐majors” with common course requirements during their freshman year, redesigning their introductory math courses, and automating parts of their advising system. Some of these approaches have been tested with comparison groups and have been shown to produce improvements in postsecondary access and persistence (Page & Gehlbach, 2017), though others have not yet been evaluated (Kurzweil & Wu, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other institutions, such as Georgia State University, have been reaching out to students during the summer, allowing students to choose “meta‐majors” with common course requirements during their freshman year, redesigning their introductory math courses, and automating parts of their advising system. Some of these approaches have been tested with comparison groups and have been shown to produce improvements in postsecondary access and persistence (Page & Gehlbach, 2017), though others have not yet been evaluated (Kurzweil & Wu, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, it has enabled advisers to build advice to the students based on facts, instead of opinions. Currently, this system is available only for the advisor not for the student [11].…”
Section: Since 1990s Miami University and Georgia Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, it facilitates decision making about the next courses' enrolment process. Author in [11] proposed an intelligent automated advising system using the bot framework. The system is implemented using both agent and object-oriented approaches.…”
Section: Single-tasking Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One group member declared they should not try active learning strategies again since their first attempt had failed; others on the team, however, remained determined to refine their teaching and assessment. This disappointing result is a reminder that gateway‐course faculty development, like gateway‐course teaching, is not “one and done.” Doing the hard work of improving gateway courses often yields only incremental positive outcomes; the cumulative power of these small changes, however, can be significant over time (Kurtzeil & Wu, ). Even when reforms build on early success, as in the G2C project at FIU, even more can be done to further enhance outcomes and sustain the gains made to date.…”
Section: What We Have Learned About Faculty Development For Gateway Cmentioning
confidence: 99%