2004
DOI: 10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.v10.i2.40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building a Network to Support Girls and Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The research studies on students in science, mathematics, and engineering at the secondary (Carlone, 2003;Drake, Clewell, & Sevo, 2002;Spears, Dyer, Franks, & Montelone, 2004) and postsecondary levels (Huang & Brainard, 2001;Hughes, 2000;Wyer, 2003) are extensive in theoretical and conceptual approaches. For instance, the application of the differential coursework hypothesis (Ethington & Wolfle 1984, 1986Nora & Horvath, 1990;Nora & Rendón, 1990;Pallas & Alexander, 1983), the spatial visualization (Fennema & Sherman, 1977;Sherman, 1980Sherman, , 1982Sherman, , 1983, the expectancy-value theory (Lips, 1995), and the college impact on retention (Pascarella, Smart, Ethington, & Nettles, 1987) were used in the past studies.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research studies on students in science, mathematics, and engineering at the secondary (Carlone, 2003;Drake, Clewell, & Sevo, 2002;Spears, Dyer, Franks, & Montelone, 2004) and postsecondary levels (Huang & Brainard, 2001;Hughes, 2000;Wyer, 2003) are extensive in theoretical and conceptual approaches. For instance, the application of the differential coursework hypothesis (Ethington & Wolfle 1984, 1986Nora & Horvath, 1990;Nora & Rendón, 1990;Pallas & Alexander, 1983), the spatial visualization (Fennema & Sherman, 1977;Sherman, 1980Sherman, , 1982Sherman, , 1983, the expectancy-value theory (Lips, 1995), and the college impact on retention (Pascarella, Smart, Ethington, & Nettles, 1987) were used in the past studies.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main theme throughout most of literature reviewed was the value of intervention at each academic level in preparing women and minorities for the next level: elementary school to middle school, middle school to high school, high school to undergraduate studies and on into graduate, doctorial and post-doctorial studies and finally into academia (faculty) and industry. [5,6,13,15,29,31,42,44,47,50,52,54] "Particular attention must be paid to transition points along that continuum…because women and minorities leave the engineering path at each of these transitions in greater proportions than non-minorities and men". [13, p. 79] Interventions can be applied in many ways to include networking, mentoring, hands-on experience, collaborative/team work, relating STEM to real-life, and promoting the social relevance of STEM fields.…”
Section: Diversity -Bringing More Women and Minorities Into The Engineering Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4,24,29,51,52] Women and minorities usually do not possess the same types of experiences that white males do entering into college because of lack of resources in their schools, lack of interest in STEM fields (possibly because the social relevance is not clear), or lack of awareness of STEM fields. [3,12,21,30,35,47] Partnering of middle or high school faculty with university faculty to explore strategies for integrating science and engineering into the classrooms is a critical component of intervention. [10,17] Also, the partnering of academic and work-based intervention programs can show young women and minorities future career opportunities while also providing role models.…”
Section: Diversity -Bringing More Women and Minorities Into The Engineering Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations