Building a measurement system of higher education performance: evidence from a Latin-American country

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper aims to propose and validate a measurement scale for integrating performance in universities with a global and local Latin-American perspective.Design/methodology/approachThis research followed a sequential, mixed-method design which uses quantitative and qualitative approaches. The data collection and analysis used two stages. The first stage was a systematic literature review analysing the data through a bibliometric analysis followed by thematic analysis. From this stage emerged the global universities' performance thematic map, a flow diagram for universities' performance system and a measurement scale. The second stage validated this scale applying a survey to the academic and administrative staff members of two Colombian private universities. A total of 705 useable responses were collected and analysed using exploratory factor analysis and the SPSS software.FindingsThe results validated five dimensions (research, resources, internationalisation, extension and academics) and 15 indicators proposed to determine the performance in universities. This study concluded that the instrument developed for measuring performance is a consistent starting point for the study of universities in Latin-American countries such as Colombia.Research limitations/implicationsThis study empirically validated the instrument for measuring performance from a systemic perspective at universities; however, a broader validation of the measurement scale is needed in the context of developing countries in Latin America to generalise the results.Practical implicationsResults provide a starting point considering the Latin-American context. They could help in future studies to improve the understanding of performance management in higher education.Originality/valuePerformance in universities has created multiple parameters and indicators, generating a lack of global consensus for their measurement. Thereof, this paper contributes to filling this gap in Latin-American universities. This work postulates a starting point considering the local context from global reported findings. It integrated the relations visually for sub-dimension and performance indicators into the university performance system. From this research emerged a novel theoretical hierarchical model for measuring university performance.

Research on the Use of Open Teaching Mode Based on IoT Applications in College Piano Courses

“…In the process of reform, there must be a strong guarantee. The development of a teaching quality assurance system suitable for the professional development needs of colleges and universities is the college education reform's insurance belt and uses the advantages of relevant mature assurance modes to construct a comprehensive teaching quality assurance mode [1,2]. It can be seen that educational digital informatization has been paid more and more attention by relevant national departments, but China's development in this regard has encountered unprecedented experience.…”

A Systematic Literature Review: University Strategic Management

“…Paula Hernandez-Diaz and colleagues [5] described creating a framework for measuring higher education achievement This article lays the groundwork for the integration of performance indicators and accrediting systems in Latin American colleges. For all items, responses with a very high impression of performance aspect satisfaction predominated.…”

Examining the Effect of Accreditation on Higher Education Performance through Motivation as a Mediator

“…This is why there is no consensus among researchers on measuring organizational performance in a university setting. Some emphasize financial aspects (Feranecová & Krigovská, 2016), while others emphasize non-financial aspects such as innovation, research, operations, services, internationalization, and governance (Alshaikhmubarak et al, 2020;Asiedu et al, 2020;Gao, 2018;Hernandez-Diaz et al, 2020;Kinanti et al, 2020;Lokuwaduge & Armstrong, 2015;Martin & Thawabieh, 2018;Rodríguez-González & Segarra, 2016).…”