2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.102867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building a high-resolution chronology for northern Hokkaido – A case study of the Late Holocene Hamanaka 2 site on Rebun Island, Hokkaido (Japan)

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the latter relates to the Satsumon culture rather than the Okhotsk culture, remains excavated from the layer II were assigned to Final Okhotsk in this study. It is difficult to separate the Motochi and Satsumon sublayers in layer II due to the disturbance (Junno et al 2021). The previously published radiocarbon dates of charred plant materials from the Nakatani location of Hamanaka 2 (Junno et al 2021;Leipe et al 2017Leipe et al , 2018Müller et al 2016) show generally consistent ages for each period, compared with the ages assigned by pottery typology.…”
Section: Hokkaido Prehistory and Hamanakamentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although the latter relates to the Satsumon culture rather than the Okhotsk culture, remains excavated from the layer II were assigned to Final Okhotsk in this study. It is difficult to separate the Motochi and Satsumon sublayers in layer II due to the disturbance (Junno et al 2021). The previously published radiocarbon dates of charred plant materials from the Nakatani location of Hamanaka 2 (Junno et al 2021;Leipe et al 2017Leipe et al , 2018Müller et al 2016) show generally consistent ages for each period, compared with the ages assigned by pottery typology.…”
Section: Hokkaido Prehistory and Hamanakamentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Several excavation campaigns have been conducted (e.g., Rebun Town 1992;Nishimoto 2000) with materials from the most recent excavations since 2011 at the Nakatani location (45°43′26′′N, 141°00′96′′E) forming the focus of this study (e.g., Kato 2015; Center for Ainu and Indigenous Studies 2017; Leipe et al 2017Leipe et al , 2018Lynch et al 2018;Müller et al 2016;Okamoto et al 2016;Tsutaya et al 2019). The Nakatani location of Hamanaka 2 yielded thin occupation layers dating to the Late/Final Jomon and Epi-Jomon periods (layers VII and VIII, dated to 299-258 cal BC: Junno et al 2021) and thick fish bone layers in the Okhotsk period, separated by a thick sand layer with few cultural remains (Center for Ainu and Indigenous Studies 2017). Okhotsk layers at Hamanaka 2 can be divided further into three phases: Initial, Middle, and Final.…”
Section: Hokkaido Prehistory and Hamanakamentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Okhotsk were marine-adapted foragers inhabiting Sakhalin, Hokkaido, and the Kuril Islands during the 5th-13th centuries AD (Amano, 2003;Hudson, 2004;Naito et al, 2010;Tsutaya et al, 2015;Junno et al, 2021). Their early occupation (5th-6th century) of Sakhalin and north Hokkaido was followed by rapid eastward expansion into east Hokkaido and the Kuril Islands during middle (7th-9th century) period (Yamaura and Ushiro, 1999;Hudson, 2004;Tsutaya et al, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%