2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-55170-8_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building a Framework for Sensitizing Concepts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we performed a thematic content analysis on the data using both deductive concept-driven coding and inductive data-driven coding (Fereday and Muir-Cochrane, 2006; Elo et al ., 2014; Hamad et al ., 2016). First, within the deductive approach, we used the six As of access to care as sensitising concepts (Moula, 2017), in order to test if the existing framework, that has been used in previous research several times, fits in the context of community-dwelling older adults accessing formal care and support services (Vaismoradi, Turunen and Bondas, 2013). For the deductive coding, a codebook was developed using the six As of access to care (Penchansky and Thomas, 1981; Wyszewianski, 2002; Saurman, 2016) (see above) as the main labels.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we performed a thematic content analysis on the data using both deductive concept-driven coding and inductive data-driven coding (Fereday and Muir-Cochrane, 2006; Elo et al ., 2014; Hamad et al ., 2016). First, within the deductive approach, we used the six As of access to care as sensitising concepts (Moula, 2017), in order to test if the existing framework, that has been used in previous research several times, fits in the context of community-dwelling older adults accessing formal care and support services (Vaismoradi, Turunen and Bondas, 2013). For the deductive coding, a codebook was developed using the six As of access to care (Penchansky and Thomas, 1981; Wyszewianski, 2002; Saurman, 2016) (see above) as the main labels.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%