2016
DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1195796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building a cross-border territorial strategy between four countries: wishful thinking?

Abstract: Since 2010 and the launch of the METROBORDER project, funded by ESPON, Luxembourg and the neighbouring regions in Belgium, France and Germany have pursued the objective of creating a cross-border polycentric metropolitan region. In order to achieve this goal, the political actors have decided to elaborate a crossborder territorial strategy to bring more coherence and cohesion to a cross-border region characterized by its strong functional integration, due to the very high number of cross-border commuters. This… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on recent studies and research [1][2][3]18,[38][39][40][41], the activation of cross-border spaces depends on many factors that enhance cross-border interaction: cooperation's across modes of transport and operators as well as the accessibility of public transport services with appropriate scheduling for users in both CBC forming areas [19].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on recent studies and research [1][2][3]18,[38][39][40][41], the activation of cross-border spaces depends on many factors that enhance cross-border interaction: cooperation's across modes of transport and operators as well as the accessibility of public transport services with appropriate scheduling for users in both CBC forming areas [19].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…European integration policy is driven by a hegemonic discourse that promotes the production of a single, uniform European space in which ‘the eradication of barriers is among its central concerns’ (Hajer, 2000: 142), even though other scholars nuance this view and show that different storylines coexist within this hegemonic discourse (Mejuto, 2017). Economic flows are often presented as drivers of stability, prosperity and territorial unity (Decoville and Durand, 2016: 1825). This so-called ‘negative integration’, which implies the elimination of barriers that restrict the movement of people, goods and services, is considered easier to put in place than measures for positive integration, which refer to the creation of a common sovereignty through the modification of existing institutions and the creation of new ones (Scharpf, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the majority of cross-border commuting (1.2 million) is accounted for by the "old" EU15 Member States [27]. Luxembourg is the European capital of cross-border commuting [27,30,31], given its economic strength and its role as the economic engine of the whole Greater Region [1,5,32].…”
Section: Cross-border Commuting In Europementioning
confidence: 99%