2013
DOI: 10.1121/1.4799220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Build-up of auditory stream segregation induced by tone sequences of constant or alternating frequency and the resetting effects of single deviants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that the nine tones preceding the deviant were unchanged relative to the standard-inducer case, the substantial reduction in segregation observed could not be attributed simply to a failure of the deviant tone to contribute to the build-up occurring during the induction sequence. These findings were interpreted as evidence that a single change to an ongoing sequence can actively reset the build-up of stream segregation (see also Haywood, 2009; Haywood & Roberts 2011a). In addition, Haywood and Roberts (2010) found that relatively small changes in frequency could trigger resetting, and so concluded that resetting does not require a change in magnitude likely to be perceived as a new source.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Given that the nine tones preceding the deviant were unchanged relative to the standard-inducer case, the substantial reduction in segregation observed could not be attributed simply to a failure of the deviant tone to contribute to the build-up occurring during the induction sequence. These findings were interpreted as evidence that a single change to an ongoing sequence can actively reset the build-up of stream segregation (see also Haywood, 2009; Haywood & Roberts 2011a). In addition, Haywood and Roberts (2010) found that relatively small changes in frequency could trigger resetting, and so concluded that resetting does not require a change in magnitude likely to be perceived as a new source.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This is true even when the acoustic properties of a tone sequence remain unchanged, for example, in an alternating low- (L) and high- (H) frequency tone sequence (Anstis & Saida, 1985; Bregman, 1978; Rogers & Bregman, 1998; see also van Noorden, 1975). A closely related effect has been observed where an “induction” sequence comprising same-frequency tones (e.g., L–L–L–…, where – represents a brief silence) can promote stream segregation in a subsequent “test” sequence comprising both H and L tones (Haywood, 2009; Haywood & Roberts, 2010; Roberts, Glasberg, & Moore 2008; Rogers & Bregman, 1993). For such an arrangement, the same-frequency induction sequence may act to promote stream segregation by capturing one subset of the test-sequence tones into an ongoing, pre-established stream (for the current example, this refers to the L tones), from which the second subset of tones is heard to be segregated (Rogers & Bregman, 1993).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Listeners were drawn from an undergraduate and postgraduate population and had a mean age of 26.4 years ( SD = 7.3, range = 19–41 years). Five of the listeners had previously contributed to one or more experiments concerning the stream segregation of pure-tone stimuli and one listener had received extensive musical training (see Haywood, 2009). 1 All listeners reported normal hearing and were screened during the training session (see Procedure section).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations