Build up big-team science

Coles, Nicholas A.; Hamlin, J. Kiley; Sullivan, Lauren L.; Parker, Timothy

doi:10.1038/d41586-022-00150-2

Cited by 55 publications

(59 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The results hold theoretical implications for multiple literatures, including research on health message framing, social influence, affective science, and public policy. More generally, the results underscore the lesson that, for policymakers and health organizations, large-scale collaborations can provide empirical answers to global questions (Coles et al, 2022 ; Forscher et al, in press ), freeing communicators from having to rely on either intuition or speculation about applications of theory in particular contexts (c.f., Haushofer & Metcalf, 2020 ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 78%

In COVID-19 Health Messaging, Loss Framing Increases Anxiety with Little-to-No Concomitant Benefits: Experimental Evidence from 84 Countries

et al. 2022

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 78%

In COVID-19 Health Messaging, Loss Framing Increases Anxiety with Little-to-No Concomitant Benefits: Experimental Evidence from 84 Countries

et al. 2022

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Furthermore, andrology should consider complementing traditional models of working with developing new networks such as grass roots collaborative networks that have a proven track record of tackling difficult questions, e.g. the Psychological Science Accelerator, ManyBabies Consortium and ManyPrimates Project (Coles et al, 2022). We should also consider the way we organize and execute studies to make it easier and more efficient to rapidly attain information, for example by having a more strategic (integrated) approach to the accumulation of evidence via a designed sequence of studies (see Nichols et al, 2021).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

WHO 2021 and 2030 reference values for semen assessment: three challenges for andrology in the journey ahead

Vasconcelos¹,

Henedi²,

Barratt

2022

Reproductive BioMedicine Online

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Rather, they are intended as a launching point for future research and collaboration. In other contexts, the emergence of grassroots consortiums (e.g., ManyBabies Consortium, 2020; Many Primates et al, 2019) has allowed scientists to pool ideas and resources, allowing "big" science to tackle big questions (Coles et al, 2022). And indeed, many of our results demonstrate the considerable advantages that come with studying conversation through a multidisciplinary lens, but also the need for larger collaborative efforts in order to make empirical progress.…”

mentioning

confidence: 63%

Advancing an Interdisciplinary Science of Conversation: Insights from a Large Multimodal Corpus of Human Speech

Reece¹,

Cooney²,

Bull³

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

People spend a substantial portion of their lives engaged in conversation, and yet our scientific understanding of conversation is still in its infancy. In this report we advance an interdisciplinary science of conversation, with findings from a large, novel, multimodal corpus of 1,656 recorded conversations in spoken English. This 7+ million word, 850-hour corpus totals over 1TB of audio, video, and transcripts, with moment-to-moment measures of vocal, facial, and semantic expression, along with an extensive survey of speaker post-conversation reflections. We leverage the considerable scope of the corpus to: (1) extend key findings from the literature, such as the cooperativeness of human turn-taking; (2) define novel algorithmic procedures for the segmentation of speech into conversational turns; (3) apply machine learning insights across various textual, auditory, and visual features to analyze what makes conversations succeed or fail; and (4) explore how conversations are related to well-being across the lifespan. We also report (5) a comprehensive mixed-method report, based on quantitative analysis and qualitative review of each recording, that showcases how individuals from diverse backgrounds alter their communication patterns and find ways to connect. We conclude with a discussion of how this large-scale public dataset may offer new directions for future research, especially across disciplinary boundaries, as scholars from a variety of fields appear increasingly interested in the study of conversation.

show abstract

Build up big-team science

Cited by 55 publications

References 13 publications

In COVID-19 Health Messaging, Loss Framing Increases Anxiety with Little-to-No Concomitant Benefits: Experimental Evidence from 84 Countries

In COVID-19 Health Messaging, Loss Framing Increases Anxiety with Little-to-No Concomitant Benefits: Experimental Evidence from 84 Countries

WHO 2021 and 2030 reference values for semen assessment: three challenges for andrology in the journey ahead

Advancing an Interdisciplinary Science of Conversation: Insights from a Large Multimodal Corpus of Human Speech

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About