1986
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90310-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Buggery in Childhood-a Common Syndrome of Child Abuse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is often a sensuality to Concerned about being less able to comfort child 13 Concerned about child's feelings 9 Considered procedure to be more appropriate for professional 8 Had difficulty in keeping child still 11 Had practical problem ofprovocation of bowel action 7 Preferred axillary measurement 36 these experiences. Possibly the sexual connotation of this activity may have been highlighted when parents were confronted with using a thermometer rectally, introducing unease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is often a sensuality to Concerned about being less able to comfort child 13 Concerned about child's feelings 9 Considered procedure to be more appropriate for professional 8 Had difficulty in keeping child still 11 Had practical problem ofprovocation of bowel action 7 Preferred axillary measurement 36 these experiences. Possibly the sexual connotation of this activity may have been highlighted when parents were confronted with using a thermometer rectally, introducing unease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This description is specific to children who have suffered sexual abuse. As such, it must be suggestive of sexual assault [35]. Intermittent contraction of the anal sphincters is described in 62% of children with anal dilatation [11].…”
Section: A N U S C R I P Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This sort of calculation is impossible, just ask Professor Drummer 3 , and is akin to the make-believe of 1665; no forensic pathologist or forensic toxicologist would give such evidence. In the 1980s, paediatricians reported a clinical sign -reflex anal dilatation -not seen in 'normal children', which therefore purported to allow the conclusion of anal penetration in children 4 . The specificity of this sign has subsequently been discredited.…”
Section: Please Scroll Down For Articlementioning
confidence: 99%