2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2005.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Buffeting of large telescopes: Wind-tunnel measurements of the flow inside a generic enclosure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The M2 flow-field wind-tunnel test 6 collected data within a scaled telescope enclosure to understand the flow field around the region near the dome opening where M2 and its supporting structure would be subjected to wind loads. The model was representative of a generic empty telescope dome at approximately 1% of the expected full-scale enclosure size for a 30 m diameter telescope.…”
Section: B Wind Tunnel Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The M2 flow-field wind-tunnel test 6 collected data within a scaled telescope enclosure to understand the flow field around the region near the dome opening where M2 and its supporting structure would be subjected to wind loads. The model was representative of a generic empty telescope dome at approximately 1% of the expected full-scale enclosure size for a 30 m diameter telescope.…”
Section: B Wind Tunnel Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most significant error source in the DPIV data is the difference between the measured particle velocities and the actual flow velocities in regions of high flow acceleration where the particles may not accurately follow the flow. 6 Significant errors are possible near the dome opening, and thus the predicted loads on M2 are computed from the error bound rather than the measured velocity.…”
Section: B Wind Tunnel Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3,4 Previous models of wind loading on the telescope structure for TMT have been based on a parametric model [4][5][6] informed by a combination of Gemini data, 7,8 wind tunnel testing 9 and CFD. Advances in CFD now allow the unsteady forces on the structure and optics to be computed directly, as a function of external wind speed, orientation of the telescope with respect to the wind, and with enclosure vents either open or closed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%