2015 IEEE 11th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/wimob.2015.7348011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Buffer management in wireless full-duplex systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to (8), R nm is a function of the pseudo-variancẽ σ 2 m of the transmitted signal and the pseudo-varianceσ 2 n of the self-interfering signal, which provides additional degrees of freedom to mitigate the asymmetric interference caused by the HWD as well as RSI. However, the achievable rate of the last hop between node R k and R k+1 is only a function ofσ 2 k due to the absence of the self-interfering link.…”
Section: In Andσmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to (8), R nm is a function of the pseudo-variancẽ σ 2 m of the transmitted signal and the pseudo-varianceσ 2 n of the self-interfering signal, which provides additional degrees of freedom to mitigate the asymmetric interference caused by the HWD as well as RSI. However, the achievable rate of the last hop between node R k and R k+1 is only a function ofσ 2 k due to the absence of the self-interfering link.…”
Section: In Andσmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, we express the link rate between nodes R m − R n in (8) as a function of the vector s carrying optimization variables:…”
Section: A Joint Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, they have shown their ability to cope with such networks. In 2014, authors of [12] proposed Wireless Queue Management (WQM), a dynamic buffer sizing scheme that addressed the unique challenges of wireless networks [13] [14]. WQM adjusts the buffer size according to the queue draining rate.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…total reward = delay reward + enq reward (14) In the above, we introduced two scaling factors δ and η. Parameter δ determines how the deviation of the current queuing delay from the target value affects the total immediate reward. Parameter η measures to what extent the dropping factor influences the reward function.…”
Section: Reward Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%