2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11018-017-1145-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Budget of Uncertainties in the Cesium Frequency Frame of Fountain Type

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The BIPM calculates it from the contribution of primary and secondary frequency standards up to one year before the reporting period. The primary frequency standards reporting data during this campaign were the Cs Fountains PTB-CSF1, PTB-CSF2 [66], SYRTE-FO1, SYRTE-FO2, SYRTE-FOM [67], SU-CsFO2 [68], NIM5 [69] and the Cs thermal beams PTB-CS1 and PTB-CS2 [70]. The Cs Fountain ITCsF2 [28] did not contributed during the campaign but submitted data within the previous year.…”
Section: Uncertainty Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BIPM calculates it from the contribution of primary and secondary frequency standards up to one year before the reporting period. The primary frequency standards reporting data during this campaign were the Cs Fountains PTB-CSF1, PTB-CSF2 [66], SYRTE-FO1, SYRTE-FO2, SYRTE-FOM [67], SU-CsFO2 [68], NIM5 [69] and the Cs thermal beams PTB-CS1 and PTB-CS2 [70]. The Cs Fountain ITCsF2 [28] did not contributed during the campaign but submitted data within the previous year.…”
Section: Uncertainty Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The satellite link uncertainty in y(UTC(NMIJ) − TAI) was calculated to be 2.3 × 10 −15 for T link = 25 days, 2.0 × 10 −16 for T link = 30 days, and 1.7 × 10 −16 for T link = 35 days using the recommended formula ( √ 2u A )/[(3600 × 24 × 5)( T link 5 ) 0.9 ] [16] with the statistical uncertainty u A = 0.3 ns reported in Circular T. The statistical and systematic uncertainties of y(TAI − SI) were calculated from the total uncertainty of y(TAI − SI) and the systematic uncertainties of the primary and secondary frequency standards reported in Circular T. During the present half-year period, the frequency of TAI was calibrated by using the following frequency standards: Cs thermal beam clocks (PTB-Cs1 and PTB-Cs2 [59]), Cs fountain clocks (SYRTE-FO1, SYRTE-FO2, SYRTE-FOM [60], PTB-CSF1, PTB-CSF2 [61], SU-CsFO2 [62], and NIM5 [63]), a Rb fountain clock (SYRTE-FORb [64]), and a Sr optical lattice clock (NICT-Sr1 [29]). Since Circular T only provides the total uncertainty of y(TAI−SI), the systematic uncertainty of y(TAI − SI) was estimated using the systematic uncertainties and weights of the individual frequency standards based on a method described in Ref.…”
Section: Absolute Frequency Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, the largest contributions to the total uncertainty are collisional shift and microwave-power related frequency shift. CsF2 [20] CsF2 [95] FO2 [96] CsF2 [97] CsFO2 [21] F2 [98] NIM5 [99] CsF1 [100] FOC2 [97]…”
Section: Fountain Clock Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time and frequency also play a vital role in the navigation systems, network synchronization in the telecommunication field, etc. Today, the cesium (Cs) and rubidium (Rb) atomic fountain clocks have achieved an accuracy of a few parts in 10 16 , [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] while the type B uncertainty of the best optical clock based on single Al + ion has been lowered down to the 10 −19 region. [26] In parallel, the state of art manufacturing technologies with the development of smaller and robust while much cheaper electronic components, have extended the applications of frequency standards to much wider areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%