2013
DOI: 10.1111/resp.12009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy via Turbuhaler versus fixed‐dose budesonide/formoterol plus terbutaline in patients with asthma: Phase III study results

Abstract: Budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy provided more effective asthma control, including a prolonged time to first severe asthma exacerbation, than budesonide/formoterol plus terbutaline and was well tolerated. Budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy also improved lung function and asthma symptoms.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following studies contained inclusion criteria that required a history of an exacerbation in the 12 months prior to randomisation [18, 19, 21-23, 25, 27-29]. The risk of severe exacerbation (AIR versus traditional algorithm) was reported as relative rate [6, 15, 16, 19, 21, 23-25, 27, 29], relative risk [7,17,28] and hazard ratio [18,22], respectively. Studies prescribed reliever therapy as follows; budesonide/formoterol (B/F) 200/6 μg, one actuation as required for relief of symptoms [6,7,15,16,19,21,22,24,25,[27][28][29]; B/F 100/6 μg, one actuation as required for relief of symptoms [17,18]; ultrafine beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol 100/6 μg (BDP/F), one actuation as required for relief of symptoms [23].…”
Section: Stepmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The following studies contained inclusion criteria that required a history of an exacerbation in the 12 months prior to randomisation [18, 19, 21-23, 25, 27-29]. The risk of severe exacerbation (AIR versus traditional algorithm) was reported as relative rate [6, 15, 16, 19, 21, 23-25, 27, 29], relative risk [7,17,28] and hazard ratio [18,22], respectively. Studies prescribed reliever therapy as follows; budesonide/formoterol (B/F) 200/6 μg, one actuation as required for relief of symptoms [6,7,15,16,19,21,22,24,25,[27][28][29]; B/F 100/6 μg, one actuation as required for relief of symptoms [17,18]; ultrafine beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol 100/6 μg (BDP/F), one actuation as required for relief of symptoms [23].…”
Section: Stepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…actuation as-needed [20][21][22], budesonide/formoterol 100/6 µg Turbuhaler two actuations once daily as maintenance together with one actuation as needed [17], and budesonide/formoterol 100/6 µg Turbuhaler one actuation twice daily as maintenance together with one actuation as-needed [18]. It may be preferable to use the budesonide/formoterol 200/6 µg Turbuhaler, as this reduces treatment complexity and enables standardisation of the 200/6 µg dose per actuation across the different steps of this proposed algorithm.…”
Section: Stepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seven studies that met the criteria were identified in the AstraZeneca clinical trial database: SD-039-0667 (STEAM) [10], SD-039-0668 (STEP) [11], SD-039-0673 (STAY) [12], SD-039-0734 (SMILE) [13], SD-039-0735 (COMPASS) [14], NCT00242775 (AHEAD) [15] and NCT00839800 (SAKURA) [16]. Of these, six were included in the analysis: NCT00839800 was excluded since it randomised only 21 adolescents, all of whom were aged ⩾16 years.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ICS and ICS/ LABA are used as a first choice for asthma treatment around the world. The effectiveness of ICS and ICS/LABA for asthma treatment is supported in plural large clinical trials [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%