“…Recent most of studies revealed unsatisfactory internal consistency for the revised scale with Cronbach’s αs lower than .70 (Costa, Pereira, & Pedras, 2012; Janzen Claude, Hadjistavropoulos, & Friesen, 2014; Kroese, Adriaanse, & De Ridder, 2012; Kroese, Adriaanse, Vinkers, van de Schoot, & de Ridder, 2014; Trouilloud & Regnier, 2013; Weinger et al, 2005), limiting the utility of the revised tool. Nevertheless, the revised SDSCA has been translated into cross-cultural versions, such as Chinese, Tai, Korean, Turkish, Arabic, Portuguese, and Maltese (Choi et al, 2011; Cosansu & Erdogan, 2014; Gao et al, 2013; Gatt & Sammut, 2008; Gucciardi, Demelo, Lee, & Grace, 2007; Jarab, Alqudah, Mukattash, Shattat, & Al-Qirim, 2012; Kav et al, 2010; Keeratiyutawong, Hanucharurnkul, Eramo Melkus, Panpakdee, & Vorapongsathorn, 2006; Navicharern, 2012; Nyunt, Howteerakul, Suwannapong, & Rajatanun, 2010; Shi, Ostwald, & Wang, 2010; Sowattanangoon, Kochabhakdi, & Petrie, 2008; Tang, Pang, Chan, Yeung, & Yeung, 2008; Vivienne Wu et al, 2008; Wu, Courtney, et al, 2007; Wu, Huang, et al, 2011; Xu et al, 2008). But, most cross-cultural versions did not achieve acceptable internal consistency, especially for diet subscale (Choi et al, 2011; Cosansu & Erdogan, 2014; Gatt & Sammut, 2008; Gucciardi et al, 2007; Kav et al, 2010; Tang et al, 2008; Xu et al, 2008).…”