2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-018-2030-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Buckling load optimization for 2D continuum models, with alternative formulation for buckling load estimation

Abstract:  Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.  You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain  You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, advances have been made in the last few years on the non-linear buckling of topologically optimized continua [446,447]. Such remarkable achievements employ non-incremental analyses and recursive design.…”
Section: Buckling and Local Instability Phenomenamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, advances have been made in the last few years on the non-linear buckling of topologically optimized continua [446,447]. Such remarkable achievements employ non-incremental analyses and recursive design.…”
Section: Buckling and Local Instability Phenomenamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the fact that non-linear analysis provides an accurate description of the buckling phenomenon, the high computational cost hinders its widespread utilization in topology optimization. To improve the computational efficiency of nonlinear analysis, Pedersen and Pedersen (2018) suggested the use of non-incremental analysis and proposed a simple sensitivity analysis along with recursive redesign. In contrast, linear buckling analysis has been commonly employed in topology optimization due to its ease of implementation and acceptable computational cost (Ferrari and Sigmund 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When pre‐buckling displacements are small, and a structural length scale is defined, LBA proves very effective. Outside such assumptions, its limitations become apparent, and the accurate evaluation of structural stability requires explicit modeling of the geometric and material nonlinearities 2,3 . This results in a nonlinear buckling analysis, which, despite its accuracy, is much more time‐consuming 4 and introduces other complications when applied to TO 5,6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%