2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2018.04.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Buckling analysis of two-directionally porous beam

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to inevitable variations in the manufacturing processes, the presence of some porosity in nanobeams is unavoidable. Inclusion of this imperfection into mechanical analysis of the piezomagnetic-flexomagnetic nano-sized beam is performed as [62]…”
Section: The Piezo-flexomagnetic Beam Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to inevitable variations in the manufacturing processes, the presence of some porosity in nanobeams is unavoidable. Inclusion of this imperfection into mechanical analysis of the piezomagnetic-flexomagnetic nano-sized beam is performed as [62]…”
Section: The Piezo-flexomagnetic Beam Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where α denotes the porosity coefficient. Axial porosities are defined mathematically and analytically in Table 1 [62]. Table 1.…”
Section: The Piezo-flexomagnetic Beam Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, there are three main methods to compute the buckling loads or enhance one structure’s buckling resistance ability, i.e., analytical methods, numerical methods, and test methods. The premise of utilizing analytical methods is that the structure’s geometry is relatively simple, for example, rods, beams, and shells [ 2 ]. Test methods generally involve expensive costs, so relatively few experimental tests are conducted, which are often employed to validate analytical methods and numerical methods [ 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a more recent study, Tang. et al [35] evaluated the effect of different porosity distribution patterns on buckling behavior of two-directionally porous beams and concluded that the porosity distribution patterns significantly affect the critical buckling load. Another study [36] revealed that the lattice pore size also affects the buckling behavior of the lattice structure significantly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the prior work done on lattice structures has been focused on investigating the compressive properties [37,38,39] of various lattice shapes; however, a limited number of studies have been investigated the buckling behavior of a very few lattice morphologies. Moreover, buckling analyses of the samples having circular and elliptical holes/pores have been carried out [35,36,40,41,42,43,44]. However, the effect of unit cell morphology and size on the critical buckling load and post-buckling behavior has not been explored yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%