2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0141-0296(02)00133-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Buckling analysis and shape optimization of elastic variable thickness circular and annular plates—I. Finite element formulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are prepared for different values of the thickness and inner-to-outer radius ratios. Additionally, to validate the results, they are compared with those obtained by Ö zakça et al [12] based on the first-order shear deformation theory (FSDT) using the finite element method (FEM). For all cases, fast rate of convergence of the method is quite evident and it is found that only five DQ grid points in the thickness direction and three elements in the radial direction are sufficient to obtain accurate results.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The results are prepared for different values of the thickness and inner-to-outer radius ratios. Additionally, to validate the results, they are compared with those obtained by Ö zakça et al [12] based on the first-order shear deformation theory (FSDT) using the finite element method (FEM). For all cases, fast rate of convergence of the method is quite evident and it is found that only five DQ grid points in the thickness direction and three elements in the radial direction are sufficient to obtain accurate results.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In Table 4, the buckling load parameters of thin-to-moderately thick free-clamped (F-C) annular plates are compared with those of the FSDT [12] for different values of the inner-to-outer radius ratios. Very close agreement between the results of the two approaches is obvious.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations