2007
DOI: 10.1089/gte.2007.0044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Buccal Cell DNA Extraction: Yield, Purity, and Cost: A Comparison of Two Methods

Abstract: Simple and cost-effective methods are needed to extract DNA in order to use it in large-scale studies. Blood is an excellent DNA source; however, it is costly and invasive thus an alternative is needed. Several kits and chemical protocols using buccal cells have been proposed for DNA extraction. The objective of the study is to evaluate buccal NaOH chemical protocol and Nucleospin Tissue Kit (BD Biosciences, Macery-Nagel, Germany) for DNA extraction. DNA swab samples were collected from 300 voluntary participa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, 2,782 (21.3%) of the 13,084 subjects who consented failed to return appropriate samples, and 3,968 (30.3%) did not yield appropriate DNA on the first attempt. In addition, although the A260/280 ratio may not be an accurate measure of nucleic acid purity and quality can be better assessed by attempting PCR amplification [4,31], low A260/280 ratio (<1.8) may suggest that buccal swab samples are subject to contamination. This finding suggests that although the buccal cell swab procedure is simple and easy, there is a degree of inter-individual variation in the amount and quality of extracted DNA because it depends on characteristics of the buccal mucosa and the force exercised with the swab.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, 2,782 (21.3%) of the 13,084 subjects who consented failed to return appropriate samples, and 3,968 (30.3%) did not yield appropriate DNA on the first attempt. In addition, although the A260/280 ratio may not be an accurate measure of nucleic acid purity and quality can be better assessed by attempting PCR amplification [4,31], low A260/280 ratio (<1.8) may suggest that buccal swab samples are subject to contamination. This finding suggests that although the buccal cell swab procedure is simple and easy, there is a degree of inter-individual variation in the amount and quality of extracted DNA because it depends on characteristics of the buccal mucosa and the force exercised with the swab.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other simple and cost-effective methods can be used with the similar results [5]. Compared with other sources of DNA, such as blood or hair, this method does not require the use of specialized consumables (syringes, anticoagulant-treated tubes, etc).…”
Section: Dna Purificationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The subjects abstained from smoking, drinking, and eating for 2 hours before buccal swab collection. DNA was extracted from the buccal cells after period of storage at 4°C, using a protocol from Saab et al (22). Then the tubes were heated at 95 °C for 7 min, after which the swab was carefully removed, discarded and treated with 30 μL of Tris-HCl (1 M; pH 8.0).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%