2021
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/01/058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bubble wall velocity: heavy physics effects

Abstract: We analyse the dynamics of the relativistic bubble expansion during the first order phase transition focusing on the ultra relativistic velocities γ 1. We show that fields much heavier than the scale of the phase transition can significantly contribute to the friction and modify the motion of the bubble wall leading to interesting phenomenological consequences. NLO effects on the friction due to the soft vector field emission are reviewed as well.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
99
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
4
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Still, even by using that resummed result, we find that the region relevant for DM phenomenology corresponds to the region where bubble walls run away, so that the difference between the results of [72] and [92] does not impact the DM abundance. As observed in [93], the pressure as determined in [92] does not tend to zero when the order parameter of the transition goes to zero, casting a shadow on that result. Therefore, both for this issue as well as for the limited impact on the DM abundance that we will discuss later, we content ourselves with a treatment analogous to [72] in our paper.…”
Section: Jhep04(2021)278mentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Still, even by using that resummed result, we find that the region relevant for DM phenomenology corresponds to the region where bubble walls run away, so that the difference between the results of [72] and [92] does not impact the DM abundance. As observed in [93], the pressure as determined in [92] does not tend to zero when the order parameter of the transition goes to zero, casting a shadow on that result. Therefore, both for this issue as well as for the limited impact on the DM abundance that we will discuss later, we content ourselves with a treatment analogous to [72] in our paper.…”
Section: Jhep04(2021)278mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…On the other hand, the run-away wall dashed line, and hence the string fragmentation line, could be affected by this choice. For simplicity as well as in light of the criticism of[92] appeared in[93,126], we employed the results of[72] in this paper.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the bubble wall speed we simply take v w = 1 in the gravitational wave amplitude, noting that there remains considerable debate in the literature as to the leading effects which contribute to this quantity; see for example refs. [121,[124][125][126][127][128]. In the following, for simplicity, we will continue to use the same names for the approximations as in section 5, though one should bear in mind these additional limitations with regard to bubble nucleation and the bubble wall speed.…”
Section: The Consequences For Gravitational Wave Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bubble walls are assumed to expand at a constant speed v w [68], which is determined by how the wall interacts with the surrounding plasma in the interplay between bubble expansion and frictional forces [69,70]. Fluid friction is thought to prevent runaway acceleration in phase transitions in gauge theories, although the details of the interactions between the particles of the plasma and the wall are under debate [71][72][73]. Ref.…”
Section: First Order Phase Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%