1971
DOI: 10.1021/i160037a027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bubble Motion Studies in a Countercurrent Flow Apparatus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Turbulence intensity in the VS of the HWTF can reach 10% at maximum pump speed (~ 37 L/min); however, Moo‐Young et al . [], in a similar, low‐pressure device, noted little effect on expected air bubble shapes and rise velocities, the latter being a sensitive indicator of bubble hydrodynamics. Likewise, the design of the flow conditioning elements in the HWTF allows a bubble, drop, or particle of up to ~20 mm diameter to have sufficient freedom to permit a measure of natural hydrodynamics, in particular, lateral path and shape oscillations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Turbulence intensity in the VS of the HWTF can reach 10% at maximum pump speed (~ 37 L/min); however, Moo‐Young et al . [], in a similar, low‐pressure device, noted little effect on expected air bubble shapes and rise velocities, the latter being a sensitive indicator of bubble hydrodynamics. Likewise, the design of the flow conditioning elements in the HWTF allows a bubble, drop, or particle of up to ~20 mm diameter to have sufficient freedom to permit a measure of natural hydrodynamics, in particular, lateral path and shape oscillations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A few studies do exist where the authors examined the flow field around gas bubbles that are held axially stationary in downward flows in rigid tubes. Moo-Young, Fulford & Cheyne (1971) experimentally suspended small bubbles (0.11 6 λ 6 0.32) in a downward liquid turbulent flow with larger bubbles requiring higher suspension flow rates. Similarly, Kojima, Akehata & Shirai (1975) investigated the behaviour of bubbles of 0.04 6 λ 6 0.2 which were held stationary in downward turbulent flows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is apparent in fig.2 (d) that an irregular fluctuation behavior is clearly seen on the autocorrelation function. This can be explained by the fact that the signals induced by different turbulent bursting events at different instants are almost uncorrelated [21][22][23][24]. In leak detection practice, non-leak acoustic sources around the water pipelines are always inevitable, such as from machine vibrations in a factory.…”
Section: A Feature Description By Autocorrelation Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%