1975
DOI: 10.1063/1.30203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bubble lattice translation-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is about a factor of four greater than that observed for lattice translation. The 23 K bubble / s mA response is considered to be in reasonable agreement with the value predicted by the deformable lattice model [15] but is significantly less than the 60 K bubble / s rnA value predicted by the rigid lattice model [12]. At current levels above five mA, the column translation rate levels off in a manner similar to that observed for lattice translation.…”
Section: Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is about a factor of four greater than that observed for lattice translation. The 23 K bubble / s mA response is considered to be in reasonable agreement with the value predicted by the deformable lattice model [15] but is significantly less than the 60 K bubble / s rnA value predicted by the rigid lattice model [12]. At current levels above five mA, the column translation rate levels off in a manner similar to that observed for lattice translation.…”
Section: Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…6 is 5.8 K columns/s mA. If we assume a domain wall mobility of 800 m 2 / As, Eggenberger's rigid lattice model [12] 3 would imply a slope of about 60 K columns/s rnA. A calculation by G. R. Henry [t 5], which includes the effects of lattice distortion and bubble size variation, correctly predicts the limiting velocity observed at currents above 15 mA and substantially reduces the difference between calculated and observed slopes.…”
Section: Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…29,30 It will also provide the best verification of charge equality in the first two generations of particles and it will improve the determination of the muon mass at the 40 ppb level (a factor 3 better than extracted from the hyperfine splitting measurement 31 ). This experiment will be statistically limited, therefore, ongoing efforts to develop a high-flux and high-brightness slow-muon beam line [32][33][34] promise even higher accuracy.…”
Section: Status Of Muonium 1s-2s Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%