2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0377-0273(03)00229-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bubble growth during decompression of magma: experimental and theoretical investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
99
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For embayments with bubbles attached to the embayment mouth, this diffusion, while a consequence of the drop in solubility during decompression, is driven by the concentration of dissolved volatiles at the melt-bubble interface, a direct function of vapor pressure inside the bubble. The diffusivities of H 2 O, CO 2 , and S in silicate melts are sufficiently small to prevent the attainment of equilibrium concentrations within embayments that have lengths on the order of 100 microns for a wide range of decompression rates (e.g., Lensky et al, 2004;Gonnerman and Manga, 2005;Pichavant et al, 2013;Zhang et al, 2007Zhang et al, , 2010. Consequently, distinct diffusion-controlled concentration profiles may be preserved within an embayment, allowing the estimation of decompression rates via diffusion modeling (Liu et al, 2007).…”
Section: Melt Embayments and Choice Of Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For embayments with bubbles attached to the embayment mouth, this diffusion, while a consequence of the drop in solubility during decompression, is driven by the concentration of dissolved volatiles at the melt-bubble interface, a direct function of vapor pressure inside the bubble. The diffusivities of H 2 O, CO 2 , and S in silicate melts are sufficiently small to prevent the attainment of equilibrium concentrations within embayments that have lengths on the order of 100 microns for a wide range of decompression rates (e.g., Lensky et al, 2004;Gonnerman and Manga, 2005;Pichavant et al, 2013;Zhang et al, 2007Zhang et al, , 2010. Consequently, distinct diffusion-controlled concentration profiles may be preserved within an embayment, allowing the estimation of decompression rates via diffusion modeling (Liu et al, 2007).…”
Section: Melt Embayments and Choice Of Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 shows the geometry of a spatially periodic array of bubbles in the gas-liquid emulsion (Pinkerton et al 2002;Proussevitch and Sahagian 1998;Lensky et al 2004;Liu and Zhang 2000) where the fluid is arranged as a two-dimensional array of hexagons surrounding bubbles spaced a distance d apart. The average bubble size Rb and spacing d are constrained by the number of bubbles per unit volume N v and their volume fraction .!…”
Section: Bouderau Et Al (200 I) Developed a Diffusion-reaction Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regime map of bubble growth in terms of two ratios of dimensionless time scales at two dimensionless times, t = t/ dec , 0.05 and 0.5 (Modified after Lensky et al, 2004 with permission by Elsevier). V = vis / dec , D = dif / dec .…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, C, , and D are density, water content, viscosity, and diffusivity of water in melt, respectively, which change with r and t. The is gas volume fraction. Modified after Lensky et al (2004) with permission by Elsevier. (Toramaru, 1988;Proussevitch et al, 1993b;Klug and Cashman, 1996 ) (retraction) Bagdassarov et al, 1996 with permission by Springer).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%