2010
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keq249a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BSR and BHPR rheumatoid arthritis guidelines on safety of anti-TNF therapies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
153
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
153
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the clinical efficacy of anti-TNF therapies and a generally reassuring safety profile, some concerns remain regarding their long-term use due to the increased incidence of serious infections, tuberculosis (10,11), and potential malignancies (12). The cost of anti-TNF therapy is also an important consideration and leads to restrictions on prescribing in many countries (13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the clinical efficacy of anti-TNF therapies and a generally reassuring safety profile, some concerns remain regarding their long-term use due to the increased incidence of serious infections, tuberculosis (10,11), and potential malignancies (12). The cost of anti-TNF therapy is also an important consideration and leads to restrictions on prescribing in many countries (13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Or, l'association entre infection sévère et anti-TNF alpha n'est pas clairement établie. Pour le registre britannique [31], les patients sous anti-TNF alpha auraient un taux d'infections sévères plus élevé, le hasard-ratio ajusté pour les infections sévères était 20 % plus élevé dans la cohorte sous anti-TNF alpha par rapport au groupe sous nbDMARDs (adj HR : ). La méta-analyse de Leombruno et al [37] n'a pas non plus mis en évidence de différence significative entre les patients sous anti-TNF et les patients sous nbDMARDs.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…La méta-analyse de Leombruno et al [37] n'a pas non plus mis en évidence de différence significative entre les patients sous anti-TNF et les patients sous nbDMARDs. Plusieurs études [31,38,39] ont conclu à une augmentation du risque infectieux au cours des six premiers mois de traitement, le temps que la maladie inflammatoire soit stabilisée. La PR représente un risque inhérent d'infection imputé au dysfonctionnement du système immunitaire.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…In the context of hematological malignancies, there are reports of myeloma, as well as monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), progressing while receiving anti-TNF treatment 2 . The British Society for Rheumatology states that there is no conclusive evidence for an increase in risk of solid tumors or lymphoproliferative disease with anti-TNF therapies above what would be expected for the rest of the RA population 3 . Further, several studies have reported anti-TNF working against solid cancers 4,5 .…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%