2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.rboe.2015.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bryan and Morrey type IV intra-articular fracture of the distal extremity of the humerus treated surgically with anterior access: case report

Abstract: Within the context of elbow-level trauma, fractures with a coronal line at the distal extremity of the humerus are rare and result from indirect axial trauma with the arm extended. These are difficult-to-treat intra-articular fractures, since they require stable anatomical reduction in order to maintain joint congruence and diminish complications such as stiffness. This paper reports a case that occurred in a young man who suffered a fall from a ladder that resulted in a Bryan and Morrey type IV intra-articula… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, open reduction with internal fixation is the mainstream choice for managing coronal shear fractures showing good to excellent outcomes, which is superior to other methods such as fracture excision, arthroscopic reduction and fixation, or total elbow arthroplasty. [1][2][3][4][5]8 Although the lateral extensile approach and fixation are commonly used, [2][3][4]9 in our opinion, the posterior approach may be better in those cases. When the posterior approach is used to expose the coronal shear fragment, a surgical osteotomy to expose the fracture site is mandatory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, open reduction with internal fixation is the mainstream choice for managing coronal shear fractures showing good to excellent outcomes, which is superior to other methods such as fracture excision, arthroscopic reduction and fixation, or total elbow arthroplasty. [1][2][3][4][5]8 Although the lateral extensile approach and fixation are commonly used, [2][3][4]9 in our opinion, the posterior approach may be better in those cases. When the posterior approach is used to expose the coronal shear fragment, a surgical osteotomy to expose the fracture site is mandatory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…To preserve blood supply and avoid disruption of the posterior soft tissue, many surgeons preferred an anterior-toposterior direction approach to employ the interfragmentary screw and fix the fracture. [2][3][4]9 In these cases, however, considering the already disrupted posterior soft tissue, we fixed the screws in the posterior-to-anterior fashion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Closed reduction, immobilization or fragment excision are generally associated with poor outcomes [ 12 , 15 ]. For ORIF, the use of headless compression screws has proven to be a suitable and reliable option [ 10 , 13 , 17 ]. However, intraarticular migration of a headless compression screw despite complete union of fracture after anatomical reduction, such as in our case, can be a concern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%