2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssnmr.2019.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brute-force solvent suppression for DNP studies of powders at natural isotopic abundance

Abstract: A method based on highly concentrated radical solutions is investigated for the suppression of the NMR signals arising from solvents that are usually used for dynamic nuclear polarization experiments. The presented method is suitable in the case of powders, which are impregnated with a radical-containing solution. It is also demonstrated that the intensity and the resolution of the signals due to the sample of interest is not affected by the high concentration of radicals. The method proposed here is therefore… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several PA concentrations were tested, from 10 to 80 mM (Figure 3 and Supporting Information Figure S6) at 9.4 T. Interestingly, the sensitivity is optimal at around 40 mM radical solution for all three PAs. These results correlate with those reported by Thureau et al., [52] where higher PA concentrations were used to suppress the solvent signals and improve the overall sensitivity. Figure 3 reports the returned sensitivity at the optimal recycle delay time Tnormalonormalpnormalt (see Supporting Information, DNP build‐up analysis) for the three radicals at 40 mM.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Several PA concentrations were tested, from 10 to 80 mM (Figure 3 and Supporting Information Figure S6) at 9.4 T. Interestingly, the sensitivity is optimal at around 40 mM radical solution for all three PAs. These results correlate with those reported by Thureau et al., [52] where higher PA concentrations were used to suppress the solvent signals and improve the overall sensitivity. Figure 3 reports the returned sensitivity at the optimal recycle delay time Tnormalonormalpnormalt (see Supporting Information, DNP build‐up analysis) for the three radicals at 40 mM.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Even when the solvent is partially deuterated, its 1 H and 13 C signals can mask those of the investigated materials. These solvent signals can be suppressed by various methods, including (i) the use of short contact times in CPMAS to selectively transfer the DNP-enhanced 1 H polarization to protonated 13 C nuclei of the investigated materials and not to deuterated 13 C sites of the solvent, (ii) the reintroduction of 13 C-2 H dipolar couplings, (iii) the use of relaxation filters, since for heterogeneous samples, such as a solid particles wetted by a PA solution, the nuclei in the solvent relax faster than those of the investigated material owing to their closer proximity to PA, and (iv) the impregnation of the sample with highly concentrated radical solutions, which results in rapid spin-lattice relaxation in the rotating frame and hence, low efficiency of the CPMAS transfer for the molecules of the frozen solvent [165,166,224]. After the coherent polarization transfer from protons to another isotope, additional pulse schemes have been applied to separate the isotropic and anisotropic interactions or to probe the internuclear connectivities and the proximities.…”
Section: Nmr Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, broad distributions of signals in the 1D surface-enhanced 13 C­{ 1 H} DNP-CP-MAS spectra in the range 50–70 ppm from the frozen DNP solvent obscure the identification of 13 C signals associated with the sp 3 carbon sites of the DLC layer and PET polymer substrate. In this respect, solvent suppression methods could be used to remove the solvent signals, although the weak 13 C signals originating from the DLC layer would likely also be suppressed during such experiments. In addition, partial dissolution of PET or other surface species into chlorinated solvents, such as CHCl 3 and TCE, may account for the additional 13 C signals in the aliphatic region (20–50 ppm) of 1D 13 C­{ 1 H} CP-MAS spectra (Figure , Figures S3 and S4).…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%