2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2004.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brunn–Minkowski inequality for mixed intersection bodies

Abstract: Hölder's inequality states that x p y q − −x, y ≥ 0 for any (x, y) ∈ L p (Ω) × L q (Ω) with 1/p + 1/q = 1. In the same situation we prove the following stronger chains of inequalities, where z = y|y| q−2 : x p y q − −x, y ≥ (A similar result holds for complex valued functions with Re(x, y) substituting for x, y. We obtain these inequalities from some stronger (though slightly more involved) ones.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These inequalities for mixed projection bodies were established by Lutwak [7]. Moreover, Brunn-Minkowski type inequality for mixed intersection bodies were established in [13,14]. Theorem 2.2 Let : K n → K n be a Blaschke-Minkowski homomorphism.…”
Section: Remark 21mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These inequalities for mixed projection bodies were established by Lutwak [7]. Moreover, Brunn-Minkowski type inequality for mixed intersection bodies were established in [13,14]. Theorem 2.2 Let : K n → K n be a Blaschke-Minkowski homomorphism.…”
Section: Remark 21mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Here,Ṽ 1 (K, L) is the dual mixed volume of the star bodies K and L. A more general version of the dual Minkowski inequality states (see [34]): If K and L are star bodies in R n , and 0 ≤ i < n − 1, thenW…”
Section: Mjommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, through the efforts of many scholars, the L p -BrunnMinkowski theory (see [11]) has been put forward and some classical inequalities were proved, such as affine isoperimetric inequality (see [13]). Here, we provide some reference data for relevant applications (see, e.g., [23,28,32,34,[36][37][38]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%