2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005006
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brucellosis Seropositivity in Animals and Humans in Ethiopia: A Meta-analysis

Abstract: BackgroundThe objectives of this study were to assess the heterogeneities of estimates and to estimate the seroprevalence of brucellosis in animals and humans in Ethiopia.Methods/Principal findingsData from 70 studies covering 75879 animals and 2223 humans were extracted. Rose Bengal Plate Test (RBPT) and Complement Fixation Test (CFT) in series were the most frequently used serological tests. A random effects model was used to calculate pooled prevalence estimates. The overall True Prevalence of brucellosis s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
33
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
7
33
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The infection of Brucella species is commonly mediated by direct contact with the placenta, fetus, fetal fluids, and vaginal discharges or byproducts (e.g., milk, meat, and cheese) from infected animals [ 23 , 24 ]. This explains why the typical route of infection is either direct ingestion or via mucous membranes, broken skin, and in rare cases intact skin [ 25 , 26 ]. Professional health workers are frequent victims of Brucella infection, especially in regions of prevalent disease, and it is documented that nearly 12% of laboratory workers in Spain get brucellosis during fieldwork [ 27 , 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The infection of Brucella species is commonly mediated by direct contact with the placenta, fetus, fetal fluids, and vaginal discharges or byproducts (e.g., milk, meat, and cheese) from infected animals [ 23 , 24 ]. This explains why the typical route of infection is either direct ingestion or via mucous membranes, broken skin, and in rare cases intact skin [ 25 , 26 ]. Professional health workers are frequent victims of Brucella infection, especially in regions of prevalent disease, and it is documented that nearly 12% of laboratory workers in Spain get brucellosis during fieldwork [ 27 , 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brucellosis has been reported in 86 different countries worldwide and is a serious threat not only to livestock but also to human health globally. Despite its brutal impact on economic loss, it is also associated with high morbidity, both for humans and animals in developing countries [ 25 , 33 ]. North African and Near East countries are listed at the top for infection and cross-infection of brucellosis [ 34 , 35 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Ethiopia, sero-prevalence studies have shown the occurrence of brucellosis in animals and in patients with recurrent febrile illness in various pastoral areas of the country [ 9 – 12 ]. However, there is little information [ 13 , 14 ] regarding the pastoralists’ awareness about the zoonotic and animal health importance of brucellosis in Ethiopia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, vaccination remains the most successful method of preventing brucellosis in animals from countries with a high incidence (23). However, specific types of live-attenuated vaccines used for controlling animal brucellosis are disadvantageous to humans (4), leading to the development of novel vaccines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was suggested that tuberculosis may depend on the T helper-1 (Th1)-type cell-mediated immune response to protect against infection by an intracellular pathogen, including Brucella (24,25). A number of studies demonstrated that DNA vaccines acted on the major histocompatibility complex class I and II following naked DNA immunization, inducing a wide range of immune responses, including antibody production, CD8 cytotoxic T cells and CD4 T helper cell activation (10,23,26). DNA vaccines overcame the disadvantages of acellular vaccines, including recombinant proteins and synthetic peptides that were not adequately processed and presented, which resulted in a failure to induce a strong CMI response as well as to confer a high degree of protection (6,27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%