Arctic One Health 2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-87853-5_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brucellosis in the Arctic and Northern Regions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 206 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar observations in the DU caribou herd were reported by Ekaluktutiak harvesters (Tomaselli et al, 2018;Hanke et al, 2021). Brucella is a zoonotic bacterium (Aguilar et al, 2022), thus its apparent increase in the DU caribou herd represents a risk to food safety. On the other hand, the presence of harmless nose bot larvae or non-zoonotic Taenia (tapeworm) cysts in caribou carcasses can give the meat a displeasing appearance, and, in some cases, would lead harvesters to discard the meat.…”
Section: Dimensions Of Environmental Healthsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar observations in the DU caribou herd were reported by Ekaluktutiak harvesters (Tomaselli et al, 2018;Hanke et al, 2021). Brucella is a zoonotic bacterium (Aguilar et al, 2022), thus its apparent increase in the DU caribou herd represents a risk to food safety. On the other hand, the presence of harmless nose bot larvae or non-zoonotic Taenia (tapeworm) cysts in caribou carcasses can give the meat a displeasing appearance, and, in some cases, would lead harvesters to discard the meat.…”
Section: Dimensions Of Environmental Healthsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Two diseases that knowledge keepers identified as increasing near the population peak and decline, brucellosis and besnoitiosis, can have detrimental effects in caribou. Brucella suis biovar 4 can cause reproductive impairment, reduced mobility, and reduced survival, and has been documented during some caribou herd declines (Ferguson, 1997;Carlsson et al, 2018;Aguilar et al, 2022). A subset of 82 DU caribou tested in 1991 were negative for this bacterium, but more serological surveys (16.3% from 2015 to 2021) and observations by harvesters in Kugluktuk and Ekaluktutiak indicate that it is now present in the herd at a relatively high prevalence (this paper; Gunn et al, 1991;Tomaselli, 2018;Hanke et al, 2021;Fernandez Aguilar et al, 2023).…”
Section: Dimensions Of Environmental Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brucella suis biovar 4 was the main infectious agent isolated from abnormalities submitted by hunters during the study period (Table 3). Although sporadic, these lesions are consistently reported in caribou herds affected by brucellosis 35 , and we can reasonably assume that at least a fraction of the exposed caribou develop severe lesions that could negatively impact survival. 7,13 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Brucella suis biovar 4 was the main infectious agent isolated from abnormalities submitted by hunters during the study period (Table 4). Although sporadic, these lesions are consistently reported in caribou herds affected by brucellosis (Aguilar et al 2022), and we can reasonably assume that at least a fraction of the exposed caribou develop severe lesions that could negatively impact survival.…”
Section: Health Determinants In Relation To Their Effects and Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 67%