Bruce V. Moore: First president of Division 14.

Farr, James L.; Tesluk, Paul E.

doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.4.478

Cited by 21 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 24 publications

(38 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…One of these was a best-selling textbook entitled How to Interview by Walter Van Dyke Bingham and Bruce Moore (1931). (On the popularity and influence of this book, see Farr and Tesluk, 1997. ) Bingham, an industrial psychologist who had been deeply involved during First World War in the development and application of aptitude and other tests for the US Army, lauded the work of the AASW groups investigating the interview for 'their splendid pioneer explorations' in 'familiar and yet little known territory ' (1929: 530, 531) and continued to devote attention to social work interviewing in subsequent editions of How to Interview.…”

Section: Social Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interviewing, social work, and Chicago sociology in the 1920s

Lee

2016

Qualitative Social Work

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper examines the work of groups established by chapters of the American Association of Social Workers in the 1920s to develop a systematic and empirically based understanding of the interactional dynamics of the interview in social casework. Now largely forgotten, this work had influence beyond social work. The paper goes on to explore the call by the Chicago sociologist Ernest Burgess to use the 'verbatim interview' as a focus of common interest by sociologists and social workers.

show abstract

Section: Social Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interviewing, social work, and Chicago sociology in the 1920s

Lee

2016

Qualitative Social Work

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Industrial‐Organizational Psychology

Koppes

2003

Handbook of Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This chapter is a nascent effort to describe the zeitgeist or social‐historical context of industrial‐organizational psychology by identifying various dynamic influences that shaped the rise of the discipline during the past 100 years in the United States. Significant developments and persons were examined within the overall social, cultural and political contexts of the times to answer the question, “ Why were psychologists studying behavior in work settings and applying psychology to improve the workplace?” The first section encapsulates I‐O psychology's growth: industrial‐organizational psychology shifted from a simple, narrowly defined technical field focused on individual issues for accomplishing organizational objectives to a complex, broad scientific and applied discipline emphasizing individual and organizational issues for achieving both individual and organizational goals. The second section describes the dynamic forces that shaped I‐O psychology and reveals that the discipline's evolution was the result of confluences of several external (socioeconomic, business, legal, military, technology, psychology) and internal forces (individuals, theories, and applications). These forces, along with other influences (e.g., interdisciplinary fields), interacted in shaping both the science and practice of industrial‐organizational psychology. The history presented in this chapter is not intended to be a comprehensive description of industrial‐organizational psychology content or a duplication of historical accounts previously written.

show abstract

Industrial–Organizational Psychology

Bryan

Vinchur

2012

Handbook of Psychology, Second Edition

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bruce V. Moore: First president of Division 14.

Cited by 21 publications

References 24 publications

Interviewing, social work, and Chicago sociology in the 1920s

Interviewing, social work, and Chicago sociology in the 1920s

Industrial‐Organizational Psychology

Industrial–Organizational Psychology

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About