2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-24651-0_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Browsing Search Results via Formal Concept Analysis: Automatic Selection of Attributes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, an inherent advantage of concept lattices is a set of relations among the concept nodes, which users can navigate in a lattice. Among visible disadvantages of FCA, the size and complexity of lattices depends on the number of objects and attributes and can be computationally demanding as compared to other clustering techniques [Cigarrán et al 2004]. …”
Section: Formal Concept Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, an inherent advantage of concept lattices is a set of relations among the concept nodes, which users can navigate in a lattice. Among visible disadvantages of FCA, the size and complexity of lattices depends on the number of objects and attributes and can be computationally demanding as compared to other clustering techniques [Cigarrán et al 2004]. …”
Section: Formal Concept Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several published solutions to extract descriptive terms for sub-collections of documents. For example, the okapi weighting scheme and the terminological formula are two of the approaches previously used in free-text IR systems [Cigarrán et al 2004]. We adopt here the technique proposed by Kuhn et al [Kuhn et al 2007], since it was defined in the context of source code to select relevant terms with respect to given clusters of source code elements.…”
Section: Selecting Descriptive Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations