2009
DOI: 10.4103/1742-6413.56360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Broom versus broom-and-brush: A comparison of Surepath® liquid-based Papanicolaou test (LBPT) collection devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
(5 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is interesting to note that in our study 66% (115/175) of qualifying practitioners have a TZSR below 80%. Other previous studies reporting on the endocervical/metaplastic cell component of LBC samples found it to be present in 70.6%, 76% and 77.14% of samples. These findings and the average TZSR of 70% from this study suggest that the greater than 80% target is not suitable for LBC samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…It is interesting to note that in our study 66% (115/175) of qualifying practitioners have a TZSR below 80%. Other previous studies reporting on the endocervical/metaplastic cell component of LBC samples found it to be present in 70.6%, 76% and 77.14% of samples. These findings and the average TZSR of 70% from this study suggest that the greater than 80% target is not suitable for LBC samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%