1985
DOI: 10.1007/bf00310991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brood defence in the great tit (Parus major): the influence of life-history and habitat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A very similar tendency was found with the peak rate of calling (not depicted here). As was found with brood defense against an owl (Curio et al 1984(Curio et al , 1985Regelmann and Curio 1983), males defended the brood significantly more strongly than did females, as reflected by all variables examined (Figs. 3, 4).…”
Section: Quantitative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A very similar tendency was found with the peak rate of calling (not depicted here). As was found with brood defense against an owl (Curio et al 1984(Curio et al , 1985Regelmann and Curio 1983), males defended the brood significantly more strongly than did females, as reflected by all variables examined (Figs. 3, 4).…”
Section: Quantitative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…This was either due to the disturbances of pairs during first brood experiments in 1989 or to the low quality of second broods (see Methods). In extended analyses of brood defense against an owl, there had been no difference in response strength between first and second broods (Curio et al 1985). To ascribe the difference between first/second brood parents to the difference between years is rendered less convincing; previous analyses of brood defense against an owl have shown but slight and non-consistent differences between years (Regelmann and Curio 1983).…”
Section: Support For the "Brood Value Hypothesis"mentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this sense offspring become more valuable as they grow older, so that the benefits of defending them increase. (See also Knight and Temple, 1986, for a review; also Coleman et al, 1985;Curio et al, 1985;McLean et al, 1986;Curio, 1987;Kiipi, 1987;Breitwisch, 1988.) The second conclusion above implies that young parents will employ more conservative defense strategies than older parents, at least if future reproductive value R(a) decreases with age.…”
Section: A = (25) N(a)mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Although parents can enhance the investment in offspring by increasing the intensity of nest defense over the breeding period (Redondo, 1989;Caro, 2005), nest defense behavior may vary among species and depending on offspring age (Curio et al, 1985;Montgomerie and Wheatherhead, 1988;Redondo, 1989), probability of parents' survival/renesting (Pavel and (Redondo, 1989;Brunton, 1990), age linking residual reproductive value (Takata et al, 2016) and conditions of broods (Pavel and Bureš, 2001). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%