Warfare in Bronze Age Society 2018
DOI: 10.1017/9781316884522.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bronze Weaponry and Cultural Mobility in Late Bronze Age Southeast Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wear from use is common on these swords (For example, NMI W107, 3D model of blade section: ), though evidence for blade-on-blade impacts is frequently in the form of shallow knocks and nicks, occasionally deeper nicks and notches (Molloy, 2011: 75–76; Molloy, 2006: 4–5 for terminology) (Figure 3), and in exceptional cases blades are cut through or fractured entirely. There is no identifiable distribution pattern for instances of wear along blades that could indicate specific trends in fighting practice (Molloy, 2006: 19–57). A similar irregularity of damage is noted by York (2002) for contemporary swords from the Thames, and by Matthews (2011) for Middle–Late Bronze Age Chelsea and Ballintober swords in Britain.…”
Section: The Middle Bronze Agementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Wear from use is common on these swords (For example, NMI W107, 3D model of blade section: ), though evidence for blade-on-blade impacts is frequently in the form of shallow knocks and nicks, occasionally deeper nicks and notches (Molloy, 2011: 75–76; Molloy, 2006: 4–5 for terminology) (Figure 3), and in exceptional cases blades are cut through or fractured entirely. There is no identifiable distribution pattern for instances of wear along blades that could indicate specific trends in fighting practice (Molloy, 2006: 19–57). A similar irregularity of damage is noted by York (2002) for contemporary swords from the Thames, and by Matthews (2011) for Middle–Late Bronze Age Chelsea and Ballintober swords in Britain.…”
Section: The Middle Bronze Agementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments were conducted by the author using a long Group II and a short Group IV blade (Molloy, 2006 and 2007). The Group II sword had a thin cross-section and well-defined cutting edges whereas the Group IV example was very narrow with a central rib and poorly-defined/shallow cutting edges.…”
Section: The Middle Bronze Agementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…25; Connolly 1998, 232). Alongside these, Type Gi swords evolved that could make deeper and more deadly cuts than their Type C predecessors (Molloy 2006; 2010). The non-midribbed daggers and short swords of Late Minoan II–III were more stocky and robust than their long and thin predecessors and thus capable of making stronger, percussive, cutting attacks.…”
Section: Weaponry In Corporementioning
confidence: 99%