2021
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2105873118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bronze Age weight systems as a measure of market integration in Western Eurasia

Abstract: Weighing technology was invented around 3000 BCE between Mesopotamia and Egypt and became widely adopted in Western Eurasia within ∼2,000 y. For the first time in history, merchants could rely on an objective frame of reference to quantify economic value. The subsequent emergence of different weight systems goes hand in hand with the formation of a continental market. However, we still do not know how the technological transmission happened and why different weight systems emerged along the way. Here, we show … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Two recent studies interpret the axes, swords, and other broken metal objects buried in hoards as the remains of Europe's earliest financial money (Ialongo et al, 2021; Ialongo & Lago, 2021). One cannot dispute that standardized weights of bronze objects were accounting tools, nor that standardized weights of metal had a wide geographical distribution.…”
Section: Understanding European Bronze Age Moneymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Two recent studies interpret the axes, swords, and other broken metal objects buried in hoards as the remains of Europe's earliest financial money (Ialongo et al, 2021; Ialongo & Lago, 2021). One cannot dispute that standardized weights of bronze objects were accounting tools, nor that standardized weights of metal had a wide geographical distribution.…”
Section: Understanding European Bronze Age Moneymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A third problem with the financial interpretation is its narrow focus on weight standards used in the eastern Mediterranean, Mesopotamia, and Central Europe. I certainly agree that “local economies were dependent on trade to procure essential but rare raw materials such as tin … and that both Eastern city‐states and European village‐societies were equally thriving in this reciprocal dependence” (Ialongo et al, 2021, 3). However, large quantities of Central European metals were also traded north with Denmark to make everyday tools (and be deposited in hoards) during the period from 1500 to 1000 bc (Radivojević et al, 2019, 163).…”
Section: Understanding European Bronze Age Moneymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…La intensificación de los contactos por tierra y mar a través de este espacio queda patente en fenómenos tempranos, detectables gracias a la arqueología pero difíciles de interpretar, como el denominado Fenómeno de Uruk (Selz, 2020;Butterlin, 2018;Schneider, Gill, Rajagopalan & Algaze, 2021). En otros casos, la estandarización de sistemas de pesos y el uso de metales preciosos como medio de pago en el tercer milenio antes de Cristo indican la necesidad de contar con medios de intercambio conocidos y, a la vez, aceptables por poblaciones muy diversas para, de este modo, favorecer transacciones habituales (Rahmstorf, 2016;Ialongo, Hermann & Rahmstorf, 2021).…”
Section: Palavras Claveunclassified
“…Clearly, it was related to weight systems, which often bear the same name (shekel, drachma). A persuasive model for the development of weight systems in the Bronze Age proposes that the diffusion of weighing technology occurred through merchants' interactions based on the "random propagation of error constrained by market self-regulation" rather than intervention by political authorities (Ialongo et al, 2021). A weight system (as distinct from a coinage weight system) was used by a state or imposed upon it for a variety of historical, commercial and military reasons (Psoma, 2015) and would be used for the weighing of bullion, but the decision to strike coinage required something more proactive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%