Brokers and the Earnings of Female Sex Workers in India

Abstract

This study examines whether working with a broker increases or reduces the payment received for the last client among female sex workers. Building on research on the informal economy and sex work, we formulate a positive embeddedness hypothesis, expecting a positive association, and an exploitation hypothesis expecting a negative association. We analyze a large survey combined with intensive interview data on female sex workers in Andhra Pradesh, India. These data uniquely distinguish between the amount the sex worker actually received and the amount the client paid. The analyses show that brokers are associated with significantly lower last payment received. Although brokers are associated with a greater number of clients in the past week, this does not result in significantly higher total earnings in the past week. Further analyses suggest that much of the negative relationship with earnings is due to the fact that brokers lead to a lack of control over the amount clients are charged. At the same time, the results fail to show that brokers actually provide services of value. Ultimately, the results support the exploitation hypothesis. We conclude by encouraging the refinement of theories of embeddedness and exploitation and calling for greater research on workers in the informal economy of developing countries.

Do the Poor Pay More for Housing? Exploitation, Profit, and Risk in Rental Markets

“…Thus, a relational perspective sees exploitation as the foundational mechanism of inequality. As Brady, Biradavolu, andBlankenship (2015, p. 1127) recently put it, "Rather than simply saying [the poor] are oppressed or disadvantaged, exploitation means there is an identifiable actor receiving disproportionate rewards. "…”

Sex Work and the Politics of Space: Case Studies of Sex Workers in Argentina and Ecuador

“…When using the term brothel, I generally refer to a commercial sex premise owned by a non-sex worker third party, and I specify if referring to a sex worker-owned business. private work, where sex workers may not have protection from client violence unless they pay a guard or pimp, who may also exert violence [39,[48][49][50].…”

Should US Physicians Support the Decriminalization of Commercial Sex?

“…The theoretical benefits of legalization are that neither buyers nor sellers risk criminal penalty, but there are nevertheless strategies in place to control STI transmission, improve sellers' safety, and quash trafficking. Primary objections are that trafficking increases [40,45] and that sellers remain at unacceptably heightened risk of violence whether commercial sex is criminalized or legalized and may be harassed by government agents [56] and exploited by brokers [57]. Like criminalization, legalization is not clearly consistent with beneficence; complying with government regulation can be oppressively burdensome for individual sellers and the benefit to the community in terms of reduced STI transmission remains questionable, given that there is still too little evidence demonstrating conclusively that legalization is an effective method of preventing epidemics.…”