2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.06.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Broiler chickens, broiler chicken meat, pigs and pork as sources of ExPEC related virulence genes and resistance in Escherichia coli isolates from community-dwelling humans and UTI patients☆

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
77
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
6
77
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This was in agreement with many previous studies that reported the genetic relatedness between APEC and human ExPEC isolates with an explanation of the origin similarity of both isolates along with the possession of common virulence and antimicrobial resistance genes [22][23][24][25]. Meanwhile, some other studies previously isolated O78 serotypes from stools of diarrheic patients [26][27][28].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This was in agreement with many previous studies that reported the genetic relatedness between APEC and human ExPEC isolates with an explanation of the origin similarity of both isolates along with the possession of common virulence and antimicrobial resistance genes [22][23][24][25]. Meanwhile, some other studies previously isolated O78 serotypes from stools of diarrheic patients [26][27][28].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Here, phylogroup distribution varied in relation not only to pathotype (ExPEC versus non-ExPEC) but also source (meat versus eggs). We determined that the major phylotypes of ExPEC chicken isolates are similar to those of ExPEC isolates that cause human disease, which belong mainly to the B2 and D phylogroups, while non-ExPEC isolates belong predominantly to groups A and B1, which are more associated with fecal isolates than disease isolates (36)(37)(38). Human isolates from phylogroups B2 and D typically contain more virulence factors than do those from groups A and B1 (39).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in some conditions, they can cause either intestinal or extraintestinal infections. Manifestation of clinical symptomatology and pathology appears to be closely associated with the possession of certain virulence gene combinations that have a range of functions, including toxin production, attachment/invasion, and immune evasion [2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%