2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2012.00954.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Broadly Reactive Polymerase Chain Reaction for Pathogen Detection in Canine Granulomatous Meningoencephalomyelitis and Necrotizing Meningoencephalitis

Abstract: Background: Granulomatous meningoencephalomyelitis (GME) and necrotizing meningoencephalitis (NME) are common inflammatory conditions of the central nervous system of dogs. Infectious pathogens, particularly viruses, are suspected to contribute to the etiopathogenesis of GME and NME.Hypothesis: Broadly reactive PCR might aid in the identification of infectious agents in GME and NME. Animals: Sixty-eight client-owned dogs evaluated by necropsy at 1 university referral hospital. Methods: A mixed prospective/retr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Infection by Cryptococcus spp is usually detected by antigen testing, and other microbial DNA or RNA can also be detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays, which have high sensitivity and specificity. [8][9][10]99 Results should still be interpreted carefully to avoid false positives, and rigorous negative controls must be evaluated in parallel with the clinical sample. A negative PCR result needs to take into account that the nucleic acid may be present but at undetectable levels, the agent may be in the neural tissue but not in CSF, and the disorder may have been triggered by an agent that is no longer present.…”
Section: Infectious Disease Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Infection by Cryptococcus spp is usually detected by antigen testing, and other microbial DNA or RNA can also be detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays, which have high sensitivity and specificity. [8][9][10]99 Results should still be interpreted carefully to avoid false positives, and rigorous negative controls must be evaluated in parallel with the clinical sample. A negative PCR result needs to take into account that the nucleic acid may be present but at undetectable levels, the agent may be in the neural tissue but not in CSF, and the disorder may have been triggered by an agent that is no longer present.…”
Section: Infectious Disease Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…99 Nonetheless, specific pathogens in CSF and diseased tissues have not been identified as being associated with the MUOs. 4,[8][9][10] Genetic Testing…”
Section: Infectious Disease Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although it did not occur frequently or consistently among cases of GME or NME, deposition of oxidized DAB throughout some vascular cuffs probed with anti-M. canis antibody (Fig. 7B and C) was evidence that the presence of M. canis in canine brains cannot be attributed solely to contamination during nonaseptic tissue collection (2). Because brain tissue specimens are typically not available for examination until long after clinical signs of chronic progressive neurological disease have developed, the abundance of intact M. canis cells remaining to be visualized at necropsy may be very low.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…We found unexpectedly that M. canis was also detectable by culture or PCR in a majority of brain tissue specimens in a retrospective case-control study of canine granulomatous meningoencephalitis (ME) (GME) and necrotizing ME (NME) (2). The presence of M. canis in brain tissue was associated with both GME and NME (both P Ͻ 0.05, as determined by a 2 test).…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%